Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 12, 1991 <br />3350 NORTH SHORE DRIVE — ZONING VIOLATIONS — CONT. <br />Callahan explained that the Lake Use Committee is currently <br />working on the DNB's shoreland regulations, which will probably <br />take until February or March of 1992. After that time, the <br />Committee would go on to review marinas. He felt that there <br />currently are ordinances covering B -2 zoning that Mr. Dunn should <br />look to for direction. <br />Dunn felt that his house is also being used as commercial. <br />Jabbour noted that if Dunn is living in the house, it is <br />considered a residential use. He stated that Dunn also had the <br />option of a home occupation license, which would not allow the <br />intensity of the current commercial use. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to direct City <br />staff to take the necessary steps to stop all commercial use of <br />the property until such time as commercial use is approved <br />through the commercial site plan review process. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT <br />A) Mayor Peterson wished Goetten Happy Birthday. <br />B) Mayor Peterson noted that she attended the AMM Board of <br />Director's meeting on legislative policy. She noted all items <br />were passed except the LMC item. She noted it was amended that <br />the Board would only support, not endorse, at the request of the <br />Mayor of Brooklyn Park, toll roads. <br />C) Goetten noted that she and Jabbour had met with two Council <br />members from Long Lake to discuss the development of the Orono <br />Orchard property. She proposed that in the future, <br />representatives from both cities meet on a regular basis to <br />discuss issues pertinent to both cities. <br />Jabbour noted that these meetings have been happening for some <br />time, but the difference they would like to see is that they be <br />proactive, not reactive to issues. Jabbour thanked the Long Lake <br />Council members in their part to resolve the annexation.issue. <br />D) Mayor Peterson noted that several Stubbs Bay residents <br />expressed a desire to hold the public meeting on the proposed <br />sewer elsewhere. She suggested the school. <br />Barrett noted that if it is a public meeting, it needs to be <br />published two weeks in a row. <br />Callahan noted that it is only an'informational meeting. <br />Gaffron clarified that the League handbook states that both• a <br />public hearing and an assessment hearing must be held and <br />published in advance. <br />15 <br />