My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
10-28-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:52:25 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:52:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
N <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — OCTOBER 289 1991 <br />MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT — CONT. <br />Gaffron stated that this application is indeed outstanding. He <br />noted it has gone through the Planning Commission review, at <br />which time they requested a survey of the property which was <br />never provided by the applicant. Since that time the property <br />has been sold at least once, and has been vacant or rented. He <br />advised that there has been boat storage on the property <br />periodically. A letter will be sent this week asking the <br />applicant once again to supply the City with a survey so the <br />review can continue. He noted that the neighboring property <br />owner has complained about the activities. <br />Jabbour reported that the people that live near the subject <br />property have always complained about the.activities allowed on <br />the subject property. <br />Goetten asked what the City has for recourse as far as the <br />outstanding application is concerned. <br />Gaffron explained this has been a sporadic problem in that the <br />boat storage problem has mainly occurred when Dunn has been the <br />owner. <br />Callahan reluctantly brought up the issue of spot zoning for the <br />property., <br />Mabusth advised of an application which will be submitted which <br />will request that three adjacent properties be rezoned from B -2 <br />to LR— residential district, because as with the subject <br />property, the adjacent three properties are all used as <br />residential. She stated that the vacant residence at 3340 North <br />Shore Drive has been bought by an adjoining neighbor, Mrs. <br />Sprague, and she will be seeking approval of continued accessory <br />use of that structure. Mabusth has advised Sprague that staff <br />will recommend that the properties be rezoned to residential to <br />eliminate the piece —meal, quasi — commercial use of the properties <br />until a legitimate B -2 user can aqcuire all of the property. She <br />noted this rezoning proposal would be similar to zoning of <br />properties between North Shore Drive Marina and Lakeside Marina. <br />Jabbour asked the Council to consider directing staff to look <br />into this matter and noted Orono needs to approve all activities <br />on a property as well as enforce ordinances. <br />Gaffron noted that it is zoned B -2 with a historic residential <br />use of the property, but the owner does have a right to store <br />boats if the commercial site plan is approved. <br />Callahan felt that perhaps the outstanding application should be <br />reviewed by Council and perhaps be denied because the requested <br />information was never submitted. <br />Gaffron asked what should be done with the money collected for <br />past marina licenses which were never issued. <br />59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.