Laserfiche WebLink
. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — OCTOBER 14, 1891 <br />(##17) LUCIA MORISON REQUEST FOR A SECOND CURB CUT <br />Moorse explained this is a request for a second curb cut because <br />of safety concerns. He noted that staff has developed some <br />alternatives which applicant does not feel are viable. <br />Morison felt the second curb cut is the simplest way to remedy <br />the situation. She explained that option #2 is not viable <br />because of the berm and trees; and option #3 is possible but <br />there is not a lot of room to turnaround. <br />Jabbour felt concern about the proximity of the curb cut to the <br />corner. He asked if it was possible to use the proposed <br />configuration, but block the existing curb cut. <br />Gerhardson noted that is what staff is proposing and to eliminate <br />the tight turn, the curb cut could be blocked off in the right- <br />of—way just short of the roadway to give a larger turnaround <br />area. <br />Goetten noted the situation is dangerous and felt a second curb <br />cut is warranted. <br />Callahan noted that in the Sugarwoods development, if safety <br />warranted a second curb cut, it would be allowed. <br />Morison felt there is no point to cut off the existing curb cut. <br />Mayor Peterson asked if it would be possible to eliminate <br />the <br />existing curb cut entirely, and make the <br />drive a "S" shape <br />to <br />provide a turnaround. <br />Moorse questioned whether the Council has <br />the authority.to <br />vary <br />from the ordinance, and asked if it should <br />be amended. <br />Goetten noted that it has been done in the <br />past. <br />Barrett pointed out the ordinance does not <br />prohibit more than <br />one, <br />curb cut, but, in this case, Gerhardson <br />feels it is better <br />to <br />have only one curb cut. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Callahan, to approve <br />a <br />second curb cut for Lucia Morison for property located at <br />1960 <br />Fox Ridge Road, per her original proposal. <br />Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />17 <br />