Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING 3 OCTOBER 14, 1991 <br />MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT <br />C) Mayor Peterson noted that Orono did request a second joint <br />Council meeting with Long Lake regarding the Highway 12 upgrade. <br />The Long Lake Mayor turned down the request and indicated they <br />did not wish to compromise on this matter, and noted she was <br />speaking for the entire Council. The Long Lake Mayor noted they <br />would support any corridor that Orono chose as long as it wasn't <br />through Long Lake. Peterson stressed that a resolution would be <br />passed this evening indicating Orono's willingness to work with <br />Long Lake and this will be submitted to MnDot. <br />Callahan noted that the newspaper noted that Long Lake is <br />thinking of forming a joint powers agreement to make sure that <br />the corridor only goes to the south of Long Lake. <br />D) Callahan referred to a letter he passed to the Council <br />members written to the Hennepin County Suburban Park Commission <br />expressing Orono's view that they do not feel it is necessary for <br />that organization to take up the study of water, as this is <br />covered by other organizations.' <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to direct <br />the Mayor of Orono to send this letter to the Hennepin County <br />Suburban Park Commission expressing Orono's opposition to that <br />organization getting involved with the study of water. Ayes 4, <br />nays 0. <br />E) Callahan explained that on Wednesday, October 16, 1991, the <br />LMCD will most likely be passing the final draft of the revised <br />wetland plan. He felt that a resolution should be adopted <br />expressing Orono's opposition to the adoption of the plan. <br />Callahan noted that even though the second draft is better than <br />the first, it still is not in the best interest of Orono's <br />citizens and will greatly impact them. He noted the plan as <br />printed states that it was done with the cooperation of the 14 <br />cities. <br />Jabbour felt that within the resolution or letter to them, <br />Orono's reasons for opposing the plan should be stated. He noted <br />that the plan has been referred to as our baby", and has had to <br />remind the LMCD that it is their plan and the City is forced to <br />deal with the issue. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to notify in <br />writing the LMCD of Orono's opposition to the plan as -drafted. <br />Jabbour emphasized that if the second plan is not sent on to the <br />Metropolitan Council by November 4, 1991 in an adopted form, the <br />first plan is to automatically be adopted. <br />Callahan noted that there is no possibility that the first plan <br />will be relied upon by anybody even if it is passed. <br />11 <br />