Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — SEPTEMBER 23, 1991" <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS — CONT. <br />Mabusth replied that there is nothing in the code which <br />addresses this type of storage. She asked about screening. <br />Simonson noted that he has visited the site where they will <br />be stored`and felt it was very well.screened from the public. <br />Barrett felt that this is a permitted use. He felt that if <br />the cars were abandoned the City could proceed with hazardous <br />proceedings to have them removed. <br />Mabusth asked that the organization contact the Building <br />Department for appropriate permits. <br />( #4) #1573 CAROL KELLY /JAMES MASSEY <br />3020 & 3030 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />REQUEST FOR,SPECIAL CONSIDERATION REGARDING PARK FEE — <br />FINAL SUBDIVISION <br />Carol Kelly was present for this application. <br />Moorse explained that this is an application for final <br />subdivision to create three lots. He noted that�the applicant is <br />disputing the valuation placedon the property in regard:: to the <br />park dedication fee and when that fee is to be paid. <br />Mabusth explained that the first subdivision request <br />involved creation of a non — riparian lot. The applicant then <br />combined property with Mr. Massey to gain a riparian lot. She <br />noted that when the park dedication ordinance went into effect, <br />it noted that all applications not filed by May 1st were to be <br />calculated under the new ordinance. Ms. Kelly's first <br />application made the deadline but the second application did not. <br />Kelly feels the valuation is too high and wants to know if she . <br />should go ahead and have a new appraisal. Kelly is-also asking <br />that the park dedication fee be paid at the time of issuance of <br />the building permit. <br />Barrett noted that the memo suggests that the assessor <br />thinks the vaulation may be. too high., <br />Mabusth questioned the assessor and he reported that if the <br />applicant feels it is too high, the applicant should come back <br />with a second appraisal. <br />.Jabbour noted that if the market value is reduced, the <br />applicant "would have to go through the abatement process to <br />reduce that value. <br />9 <br />