Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED CITY FACILITIES — AUGUST 28, 1991 <br />There have been public meetings to reduce the size and cost <br />of the building but still trying to maintain a level of quality <br />that would be in keeping with the spirit of Orono. Since then <br />the Design Committee has reduced the public works building to <br />24,700 s.f. and has been able to reduce the administrative /police <br />building by another 1,000 s.f. making the size 16,500 s.f. The <br />Committee has not addressed new furnishing for the building yet. <br />The Committee has considered items such as large storage <br />tanks for gas, which are quite expensive ($150,000- 200,000), <br />which would permit us to buy gasoline at a $.05 /gallon cheaper <br />which is estimated would pay for the tank installation within 5 <br />years. Also sending people offsite to get repairs done or to <br />fill tanks takes them away from their work. <br />Now the total cost is approaching the $4.0 million mark and <br />the Committee is hoping to reduce that further. <br />The next question for the Council to resolve was how to <br />finance the project. The Council determined to form a HRA and to <br />engage in essentially a sale and lease —back. One result of that <br />is that a referendum will not be necessary. The question of <br />referendum is perhaps misunderstood by the public. The <br />referendum that would have taken place would have been on a bond <br />with a yes or no answer on that question only. There is no room <br />for manuvering. If the result was "no, the bond should not be <br />issued the whole process would stop and have to start all over. <br />Quite often the referendum is a way for citizens to.express their <br />pleasure or displeasure on the entire project. <br />Callahan felt that the citizens have been very interested in <br />this project from the onset and he wanted to assure them that the <br />Council has carefully looked at all of the issues involved. He <br />felt that most citizens felt there should be a new facility, <br />however after that there is not a single factor that has an <br />absolute answer. In the overall picture of the way that the <br />citizens want Orono to be run, the citizens are satisfied as far <br />as -their own input is concerned, and if they are not, it is not <br />too late to change as the money has not yet been borrowed nor has <br />a contract to build been finalized. <br />The HRA, unlike the referendum method, gives us a flexible <br />method of financing at a time when the lowest interest rate for <br />bonds is available and construction costs are also down. The <br />referendum could delay the project for an indefinite time. <br />The City does have a large cash reserve, $2.5 to 2.6 <br />million. However, the Council has not decided whether to use the <br />entire reserve and borrow the remainder or to borrow the entire <br />amount and keep the investment of the reserve. The general <br />revenues of the City are also affected by this reserve as the <br />City receives over $100,000 each year through interest. There are <br />many reasons for maintaining the reserve, including the State <br />closing down on the ability to tax and emergencies. A decision <br />will have to be made within the next month or two. <br />5 <br />