My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-1991 Council Minutes City Facilites Public Hearing
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
08-28-1991 Council Minutes City Facilites Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:45:08 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:45:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED CITY FACILITIES — AUGUST 28, 1991 <br />The election of that year intervened with the progress at <br />that point, even though the issue was a part of the election. <br />This year the Council has actively worked on the realization of <br />this project. <br />The site selection was the first matter the Council had to <br />decide upon. Public meetings were held by the Citizen's <br />Committee, Planning Commission and Council for the determination <br />of location selection. The result of the information presented <br />was the recommendation of the Highway-12 site, which is the site <br />we now have exercised our option on. Callahan felt that the <br />difficulty of the Crystal Bay site was that it was too small to <br />put both the public works and administration /police on the same <br />site unless condemnation of some homes was undertaken, which the <br />Council did not want to do. The old sewer pond property was <br />determined not to be suitable for the public works department. <br />Also, if the administration /police building were�to be placed at <br />Crystal Bay, water would have to be supplied, including building <br />a water tower and this would add considerably to the cost. <br />Public meetings were held on both the design of the buildng <br />and the construction manager issue. A Design Committee was <br />formed which included the Council, 3 Planning Commission members, <br />and the Chair from the Citizen's Committee. It was decided that <br />a construction manager would be retained to assist and advise <br />regarding cost benefit analysis of the building and the costs of <br />the building. Maureen Bellows, Planning Commissioner, was <br />extremely helpful in this choice as she i's a. professional <br />architect and is familar with the basic contracts and language. <br />It was determined that City staff was not equiped to watch the <br />construction closely enough without outside full —time assistance. <br />The firm of Krause Anderson was retained. This organization <br />has done a considerable amount of work in this area and has <br />worked with Boarman extensively. The construction manager has <br />been helping for about three weeks now. <br />The next problem to resolve was the financing of the <br />building. The Council determined that a HRA- should be formed and <br />in effect create a sale and lease —back. Public meetings were <br />held regarding this and it was covered quite extensively in the <br />press. <br />With that background, Callahan reiterated that there clearly <br />was a need for new facilities not only because of the safety <br />factors but because of lack of operational efficiency of the <br />current buildings. Also, it is a matter of Community pride. <br />Another question to be answered is how big should the new <br />facilities be. The experts have reported that a much larger <br />facility is needed to run, the City. Boarman has considered <br />personnel, how many offices, what size of office, and what they <br />are going to do when they get there. They have also taken into <br />consideration growth of staff, possible in —house rather than <br />contractural services such as engineer, assessor and attorney. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.