Laserfiche WebLink
J I le .. <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1991 <br />(# 9) STUBBS BAY •SEiIER CONTINUED <br />Jabbour said, "I believe that the project is long overdue, <br />and that Council must make a decision. This project is necessary <br />for the public's health, safety and welfare. I think we should <br />deal with the cost issues after the final numbers are known." <br />Mayor Peterson asked John Thiesse, a member of the Stubbs. <br />Bay Sewer Committee, if he had any additional information. <br />Thiesse advised Council that he talked with 27 people in the <br />Stubbs Bay area about the project. He said, "I would estimate <br />that approximately 85% of those people would pay up to 60% of the <br />cost of the project." <br />Mayor Peterson agreed with. Jabbour that the project has to <br />be done. She asked what the next step should be. <br />Glenn Cook stated that the next step should be updating the <br />costs indicated in the original feasibility study. <br />Mayor Peterson asked if the areas to be included in the <br />project have changed since the original feasibility study was <br />done. She said, "There were discussions about excluding <br />Christine Drive and Oxford Road." <br />Bernhardson advised that neither Christine Drive, nor Oxford <br />Road were included in the original project. Properties east of <br />Leaf Street were not included in the original project, but <br />properties in this location are approaching the point where they <br />may need to be included.. He said. "Properties in the Bederwood <br />and Bayside areas meeting specific criteria could 'opt -out' of <br />the project. That criteria, would also apply to the properties on <br />Christine Drive and Oxford Road." <br />Goetten understood that there were several properties on <br />Oxford Road in need of municipal sewer. <br />Gaffron confirmed that there are three properties on Oxford <br />Road that have problems with their septic systems. Two of the <br />systems have problems related to distribution systems and can be <br />repaired. The problem with the system on the third property is <br />that it has been over used for many years, and must either be <br />added onto or replaced. <br />Goetten asked if any of these properties are on the lake. <br />Gaffron replied, "Two of the properties are not lakeshore. <br />Virtually every property has two acres and the ability to replace <br />the existing system if need be. The question is whether, from a <br />philosophical viewpoint, the City wants to sewer lakeshore <br />properties. In my opinion, it makes good sense to sewer <br />lakeshore properties." <br />