Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1991 <br />( $6) WHITNEY MACMILLAN ... <br />1620 FOX STREET <br />REQUEST TO WAIVE DIRECTIVE OF DEMOLITION PERMIT <br />Mr. and Mrs. Whitney MacMillan were present. <br />Bernhardson provided an overview of the events that took <br />place and __issues involved with this application. (Refer to Jeanne <br />Mabusth's June 20, 1991, memo). He added that should Council <br />approve the MacMillan's request to waive the need for a <br />demolition permit, it would then be necessary to grant a Variance <br />to the City's Ordinance requiring the use of clean fill. <br />Mrs. MacMillan explained that she was not aware of the need <br />for a demolition permit. They had hired a contractor to come in <br />and crush what remained of the house, after it had been burned. <br />The crushed material was then buried in a hole. She stated that <br />it was not until the process was complete that she received a <br />letter from the City notifying her of the need to have obtained <br />a demolition permit. Mrs. MacMillan. stated that there was <br />nothing in the burning /demolition process with the Fire <br />Department or City that alerted her to the fact that such a <br />permit was needed. She stated that the Building Inspectors had <br />been out to the property several times and had not informed them <br />of the need for a demolition permit. <br />Jabbour suggested that it may be appropriate to require the <br />various Fire Departments to notify people that a demolition <br />permit must be obtained from the City in conjunction with burning <br />a building. <br />Mabusth stated that persons intending to burn. a structure <br />must obtain a permit from the PCA. The PCA permit application <br />includes a question about the method that will be used to dispose <br />of the debris. If the applicants indicate that the debris is to <br />be buried on site, the PCA requires that certain covenants be <br />filed in the chain of title for that particular property. <br />Callahan noted that Mr. MacMillan's letter of June 4, 1991, <br />indicates that he will provide the necessary covenants to meet <br />the PCA requirements. He questioned what further action is <br />required on the part of the City Council. <br />Mabusth explained that the MacMillan's did not obtain a <br />demolition permit to demolish the structure on their property. <br />When . City Staff notified the MacMillan's for the need of such a <br />permit, they sent' a letter asking that the requirement for a <br />demolition permit be waived. She noted that it was not until <br />today, when Staff further discussed this issue, that it was <br />determined there would be a need for a Variance proceeding If <br />Council granted the MacMillan's request. It would be necessary <br />to hold a Public Hearing before the Planning Commission and <br />obtain approval of a Variance from the City's Ordinance requiring <br />== <br />