My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
05-28-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:34:45 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:34:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' r <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1991 <br />(#3)NAVARRE HEIGHTS STORM SEWER CQNTINUED <br />Mitchell asked. "Would it be safe to say that the water is <br />following its natural drainage pattern at this time ?" <br />Cook replied, "Yes, that would be correct." <br />Mitchell said, "I am trying to point out that Plinnesota Law <br />entitles water to flow downstream, which is what it is now doing., <br />The City has the authority to put in a pipe wherever they feel it <br />is necessary, but the City cannot assess the cost back to <br />residents that will have no benefit from that project. The water <br />is simply going where it has always gone, and the residents in <br />the area are not obligated to pay for that." <br />There were no additional comments from the public, and Mayor <br />Peterson closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. <br />It was moved by Jabbour; seconded by Butler, to abandon this <br />project, based on the fact that the vast majority of residents in <br />the area are opposed to it.. Further, there is no public safety <br />risk to warrant the City to mandate the project and assess the <br />residents. Mayor Peterson stated that there has been a <br />significant amount of time and money spent on this issue. She <br />commented that it would have been helpful if all those opposed to <br />the project would have come forward at the very beginning. She <br />thanked the residents for coming forward at this point. Butler <br />stated that given the fact that the majority of residents would <br />appeal the assessment of this project, it would be unwise to <br />proceed any further. Jabbour added that Council would not be <br />spending the citizen's. tax dollars economically if it chooses to <br />engage legal counsel to assist with the appeal process. All <br />voted aye. Motion passed. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES: <br />( #4 *)MINUTES OF MAY 13, 1991 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held May 13, 1991. All <br />voted. aye. Motion passed. <br />( #5 *)MINUTES OF MAY 13, 1991 RE- CONVENED BOARD OF REVIEW <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the <br />minutes of the May 13, 1991 Re- convened Board of. Review. All <br />voted aye. (lotion passed. <br />LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JOELLEN HURR <br />LMCD Representative, JoEllen Hurr, reported that at the flay <br />22, 1991 LMCD Board -Meeting, the license request- for- Lakeside <br />Marina was reviewed and granted. This Marina had been given <br />approval last year to extend its dock out .600 feet. Hurr and <br />Councilmember Jabbour, who attended the meeting, informed the <br />Board that they felt 600 feet was excessive and should not be <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.