My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
05-28-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:34:45 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:34:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28, 1991 <br />( #16)HIGHVIAY 12 CORRIDOR CONTINUED <br />Goetten commented that the suggestion to have a mediator <br />present gives one the feeling that there is already friction <br />before the meeting occurs. <br />With regard to eliminating the south bypass, Bernhardson <br />suggested it may be appropriate to specify no south bypass within <br />the City of Orono to avoid any unnecessary conflict with Maple <br />Plain or Independence. He advised that the City of Independence <br />has been preserving a corridor that they consider to be a <br />southern bypass. <br />Callahan asked the members of the Citizen's Group if they <br />are in support of the City Council's position. <br />Ben Field replied, "I represent the northern, County Road 6 <br />group, and we are very much in favor of the Council's stand on <br />where the corridor should go. We would encourage a very forceful <br />representation of that to MNDOT when the meeting with the <br />Commission of Transportation occurs." <br />Jabbour stated that what he has sensed from talking with <br />members of the Citizen's Group is that they feel that Council has <br />"dropped the ball since making our motion to take a firm <br />position. He said, "I think the Group would like Council to now <br />sell that idea forcefully to whoever is in charge." <br />Bruce Carlson indicated that he did not think Council had <br />dropped the ball, but had merely come to the next step in the <br />process. He asked Council if anyone knows what assumptions were <br />used in the preparation of the preliminary studies. <br />Bernhardson stated that PINDOT did not explain their <br />methodology to a great degree. He suggested that it may-.be <br />helpful to ask Larry Dallam directly about specific assumptions. <br />Carlson asked if Council is aware of the purpose for the <br />upcoming meeting with the Commissioner of Transportation. - <br />Bernhardson replied, "The City received a call indicating <br />that the Commissioner would like to talk individually with <br />elected representatives of the two communities." <br />Jabbour stated that he would like to know when the meeting <br />will take place, and who will be attending it. <br />Bernhardson indicated that the date of June 17, 1991 is <br />being tentatively considered. <br />Goetten expressed. concern about waiting that long for the <br />meeting to take place, and suggested it be held next week. <br />- 15 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.