My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
04-22-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:28:51 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:28:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 22, 1991 <br />(#15)STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED <br />presented. He said, "I would like to see the committee put <br />together some option that would constitute a general consensus <br />and then present that package to the residents, and see !if we <br />can't meet half way. <br />Callahan stated that the cost is an important factor, but <br />before that i.s determined, it i_s necessa_y to determine: what <br />areas will be included in the project. <br />Jerry Rowlet::e asked if the Sta,:e has established any <br />=specific time frame by which Lakeshore properties milst b--� <br />sewered. <br />Goetten stated treat the City's Comprehensive Plan I cites <br />Stubbs Bay as the last lakeshore area to be sewered, but does not <br />set forth a time frame. <br />Lee Harren, 175 Landmark Drive, stated that he supports the <br />sewer project a;.-id believes that sewer should be installed, but <br />the City should e::amine what properties are to be included and <br />which are to be excluded. He said, "I was in the same position <br />as the Z i esmers, eXcept that I decided in March, 1989, to have a <br />mound system put in, because I was told that_ I deal not have any <br />alternative. I am within the area set forth in the Comprehensive <br />Plan as needing sewer, but my property does not need sewer.; I am <br />raying that sewer is a good idea, but those of us with two -plus <br />ac; _e loss and new existing mound systems need alternatives and <br />some flexibility." <br />Jabbour suggested that those people that have already been <br />actively involved with this project would make ideal members for <br />the citizens committee. <br />John Burger asked for the opportunity to comment. He!' said, <br />"In the State Legislature, where I spent considerable time in <br />recent years, there is an anti _T Minnetonka attitude.; I am <br />afraid that if we do not exercise our judgment -and do the things <br />that need to be done, that someone else will be telling us what <br />to do. The attitude is that nothing is too expensive for people <br />that live on Lake Minnetonka, or too unfair, as long as Lake <br />Minnetonka people pay for it. I cannot document this, but.'I can <br />tell y1ou ghat t:aere will be, actions taken, bocause' Lake <br />Minnetonka is becoming a more Statc -wide resource. If �Ie who live <br />out here want to have anything to say about it all, we had better <br />start talking. I urge the Council and Staff to do whatever is <br />necessary to get this sewer project done. We all know that it <br />needs to be done, and that things are not going to get any less <br />expensive. I -am willing to help and will do anything that I <br />can." <br />Mayor Peterson suggested having Dave Peterson and John <br />- 20 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.