Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING•HELD APRIL 22, 1991 <br />' <br />(#9)ZONINGFILE #1626 -TRAFF CONTINUED <br />present it to Council at their M,ay 13, 1991, meeting. All voted <br />aye. Motion passed. <br />Mayor Peterson closed the Public Hearings on Zoning File <br />#1623, and #1626, at 8:39 p.m. <br />ENGINEER'S REPORT: <br />(#10 *)REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #6- PUMPHOUSE #3 <br />At Mayor Peterson's request, Council voted to add this item <br />to the Consent Agenda. <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by, Mayor Peterson, to <br />approve Payment Request #6 in the amount of $29, 925.00, to <br />Richmar Construction for the Pumphouse #3 project. All voted <br />aye. Motion passed. <br />MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT: <br />Councilmember Callahan stated that he had a:z item he wished <br />to discuss before proceeding with the numbered items under the <br />Mayor /Council Report. He said, "The next item on the Agenda is <br />the Planning Commission appointments to fill tWO existing <br />vacancies. At the present time, the City's Ordinance pj- ovides <br />that- the Planning Commission terns are to be for three years, <br />staggered. I would like to make a .notion that we amend that <br />Ordinance prior to filling the vacancies so that the term will be <br />for one year, and that each of the succeeding terms, as they come <br />up, will. also revert }o one year. The reason I am suggesting to. <br />make such a motion is that it appears to me that we have a <br />somewhat serious condition with the- Planning Commission on a <br />broad, administrative level. That is my own personal opinion. <br />It appears to ::ie that there has developed a serious amount of <br />antagonism between the Planning Commission and Council. The <br />Planning commission has an institutional, as opposed to an <br />individual, view-, that the removal of the Council, that is the <br />somewhat idiotic. and cowardly Council,. by the Planning Commission <br />would lead t-o a much batter administration of the City.. . I have . <br />also h <<d the ,feeling that there were a few membe:-s of that <br />Planning Commission who felt that tizey would be willing to step <br />in if forced to take that position. <br />I have this feeling because I remember having been at a <br />meeting of th-; Planning Commission and Council about three years <br />ago where that feeling was expressed rather forcefully by the <br />members of thy.=_ Planning Commission who we;-e there. I have not <br />seen anything in, the change of the membership of the Planning <br />Commission which makes me think that feeling has changed. I also <br />have that feeling because I have heard members of the Planning <br />Commission, , within -this current year express vie-ws, about the <br />competence of the Council, on,certain matters, in language which <br />- 14 -.. <br />