My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
04-08-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:28:09 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:28:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 8, 1991 <br />( #18)STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED <br />without a majority consensus of residents. <br />Callahan stated that he did not expect the consensus of the <br />citizens committee to be that the residents are in favor of the <br />project. He suggested that the committee.may be able to get the <br />residents more focused on the issue, which will help to determine <br />the size of the area that is to be included in the project. <br />Goetten stated that the City has tried to be accommodating <br />and not to push the project down anyone's throat. She said, <br />"That is part of the problem. We are going to have to bite the <br />bullet and make the decision. We owe that much to these people." <br />Jabbour agreed w.-th comments m-ade earlier by Butler <br />regarding the overall health, safety and welfare of the public. <br />He said, "I bolieve, and it is only my personal observation, that <br />quito a bit of leaking arid seepage is occurring fram those <br />properties into Lake Minnetonka." <br />In that regard, Butler added, "People who firid it more <br />convenient to allow their septic tanks to seep into Lake <br />Minnetonka, rather than having them pumped, may be interested in <br />knowing that the City can institute condemnation proceedings <br />against their dwelling because it does not have satisfactory <br />sanitary sewer removal system. Then their home is worth <br />nothing." <br />Butler asked whether the City had surveyed the Stubbs Bay <br />area residents to determine their position on the project. <br />Gaffron replied, "We dial send out a survey. Fifty percent <br />of the 100 property owne:-s that received the survey did not <br />respond. Of the fifty percent that did respond, one -third <br />indicated that they favored the project, the other two- thirds <br />opposed it." <br />Butler stated that the City could go through a committee <br />process, which would make the residents feel more a part of the <br />process. She added, however, that if the Council were to vote to <br />order the project, and -someone subsequently sued the City in <br />regard to the assessment, that the City would prevail due to the <br />overwhelming need for sewer in that .area. The City would have <br />the support of its Comprehensive Plan, Metropolitan Council, <br />Metropolitan Waste Control, as well as the Lake protection <br />agencies. She said, "You do not fool around with malfunctioning <br />septic systems. If that is the case,-the City automatically has <br />a health P. oblem. . Once it is determined that there a� -e <br />properties with septic systems leeching into the Lake, the State <br />will close them down, if the City does not <br />Gaffron stated that may not always be the case, He said, <br />- 24 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.