My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
02-25-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:26:18 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:26:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1991 <br />( #3)ZONING FILE #1605- LINDSTROM CONTINUED <br />particular lot. It is unfortunate that this house was approved <br />and granted Variances in order to have existing cabins removed. <br />The City should work with you as much as we can, but the question <br />is at what point does a property become developed to its maximum <br />capability. I think it may be possible to make considerations in <br />light of removing the deck. I do not foresee us trading <br />hardcover that should never have been there, even in the 75 -250' <br />setback area. I think Staff misunderstood my personal intention <br />regarding this issue. Any excess of rock and plastic hardcover, <br />in any zone, is non - conforming and should never have been there " <br />and cannot be traded. If a person has less than 25% in the <br />75 -250' setback area, and quite a bit of it is plastic and rocks, -_ <br />and he /she wishes to trade that for structure, I would not <br />disagree with that." <br />Goetten wished to clarify her position regarding swimming <br />pools. She said, "When Council was deciding whether or not a <br />swimming pool constituted hardcover, I was in the minority when <br />the vote indicated that it would not be hardcover." <br />Goetten suggested to Bedker that he may wish to work with <br />Staff to examine whether portions of the driveway could be <br />removed, while maintaining a safe access. <br />Bedker explained that he had tried to locate the additions <br />over the existing driveway hardcover and house. He said, "I have <br />not heard Council address the second story. Is that a problem to <br />go up ?" <br />Goetten said, "I would prefer that you go up and not out. <br />However, I was concerned about the fact that you are <br />approximately doubling the square footage of the existing house." <br />Mayor Peterson stated that she did not object to the average <br />lakeshore setback Variance, or the second story addition. She <br />asked - Jeanne if the driveway had been indicated on the plans <br />approved in 1974 as it now appears. <br />Mabusth replied, "Unless Michael has an old site plan <br />actually showing the driveway, it is doubtful. In 1974 the City <br />did not have its Shoreland Regulations in place and driveway <br />hardcover was not considered." <br />Mayor Peterson asked Bedker whether Dr. Lindstrom would be <br />willing to remove a portion of the lakeside deck. <br />Bedker replied, "I have would have to discuss that issue <br />with Dr. Lindstrom." <br />Goetten said, "I think the Council's position is that the <br />plan is too ambitious for the lot." If the additions could be <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.