My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-25-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:26:18 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:26:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 25, 1991 <br />( #8)SHORELAND REGULATIONS CONTINUED <br />thought that was a major statement. I found the Commissioner to <br />be more receptive to our way of thinking. ". Jabbour also stated <br />that the Commissioner also warned of the Zebra Mussel that may <br />infest Minnesota lakes. <br />Goetten stated that she would like the preface page to the <br />City's Shoreland Regulations to include a statement indicating <br />Orono's position for protecting the environment. <br />Jabbour stated that the first page of the Comprehensive Plan <br />could be used. <br />Goetten and Mayor Peterson concurred with Jabbour's <br />suggestion. <br />Council accepted the information presented by Bernhardson <br />and took no formal action. <br />( #9)FACILITIES REVIEW <br />Bernhardson presented Council with information pertaining to <br />the issues and factors of a common facility site versus split <br />sites. He provided Council with a rough draft of a questionnaire <br />for residents of the Crystal Bay area, and noted that <br />Councilmember Callahan had requested the opportunity to further <br />consider it. He said, "I have also included some information on <br />options for the Public Works facilities. Staff would like <br />Council to consider a scenario where we fence off the equipment <br />here in the Spring, or utilize the Water Tower property, while we <br />tear down the existing facility. Depending on the progress we <br />are, making toward a permanent facility, and how quickly that may <br />be constructed, we would either wait or look at renting a 5,000 <br />s.f. temporary facility located here, at the sewer plant, or in <br />Navarre. Staff did examine the possibility of existing rental <br />space, but only found a facility in Tonka Bay that would cost <br />approximately $50,000 /year, plus utilities. It was John's <br />opinion that the whole department should be moved if it is going <br />to be moved that far away. If we are not going to seriously <br />consider the rental property, we need to let the people involved <br />know that as soon as possible." <br />Goetten stated that she is mainly concerned about the safety <br />of the employees. She said, "Given the condition of the existing <br />building, I believe we need to do something as soon as possible. <br />I cannot say that I favor renting space for $50,000 per year. <br />Constructing a temporary pole barn facility may be'! the answer, <br />especially if we could find a use for it later. We have to get <br />our people out of that building." <br />Jabbour said, "I believe that Band -Aid solutions are going <br />to wind up costing the City a lot of money. I hope that everyone <br />recognizes the seriousness and urgency of trying to go forward . <br />- 10 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.