My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-11-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:25:42 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:25:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 11, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1615 & #1616- MROZ /HOPKINS CONTINUED <br />She said, "There is no legal easement granting access for the <br />adjacent property owners to the Golf Course. I would refer to <br />Mr. Mroz for any information he may have in this respect. I <br />explained to the Attorney that the City must be assured that two <br />acres of dry contiguous land is maintained. With the exclusion <br />of the wetland, and the areas of the 30 foot and 15 foot drainage <br />easements, the dry contiguous is reduced to 2.11 acres. I <br />advised the Attorney that any access easement that is created <br />over that portion of property may reduce that area below the <br />required two acre minimum." <br />Mr. M::oz said, "The property owner in question is John <br />Powers. He had approached us about purchasing the portion of our <br />property that is located behind his house. We informed him we <br />could not sell any portion of the property. Mr. Powers asked us <br />if we would allow the Club to continue maintaining any portion of <br />that property that is not used by the new homeowner. We informed <br />Mr. Powers that we would agree to such an arrangement. I do not <br />believe we can legally grant an access easement." <br />Callahan asked whether the access would continue to be used. <br />Mr. Mroz replied, "It would depend on who owns the property. <br />I would imagine it may be used by the adjacent property owners." <br />Jabbour asked if the City would be notified by the County if <br />the property owners filed an access easement after the <br />subdivision is completed. <br />Mabusth stated that the County would more than likely not <br />provide any notification to the City of such an easement being <br />filed. <br />Barrett stated that the property owners could file such an <br />easement. He said, "If an easement were filed and came to the <br />City's attention, the City could treat it as a violation of our <br />Subdivision Ordinance. Secondly, the City is putting the <br />property owner on notice that, if the easement decreases the lot <br />size, it cannot be developed. That is the practical leverage <br />that the City has to prevent unwanted easements,." <br />Callahan suggested that such language be included in the <br />resolution. <br />Goetten stated that she would grant the property owners <br />access to sewer and water because Ferndale Green has sewer and <br />water and the lots do meet the two acre minimum. <br />Bernhardson suggested further amending the resolution to <br />also place the property owners on, notice that the provision of <br />municipal water and sewer does not entail a potential reduction <br />- 14 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.