My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
01-14-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:24:08 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:24:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I - , <br />ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 14, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1334 - REBERS CONSTRUCTION CONTINUED <br />matter, but felt that the Planning Commission had worked very <br />hard on this PRD. y ,r <br />Mayor Peterson asked Mr. Pflaum and Mr. Rebers if they had <br />any questions or comments and they indicated that they had none. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt <br />Resolution #2917, amending Resolution #2652. Motion, Ayes -3, <br />Callahan, Nay. Motion passed. <br />#1521 STEVEN LOMBARDOZZI, 115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />RESOLUTION #2918 <br />Mr. Lombardozzi and Mr. Peterson were present. <br />Bernhardson presented information from the City Attorney <br />pertaining to the issue of whether turning the private road into <br />a public road constituted a "taking" by the City. He said, "The <br />City Attorney has determined that Mr. Wear does not have a valid <br />claim of a taking." <br />Mayor Paterson asked the City Attorney whether it will be <br />necessary for the City to reimburse Mr. Wear for the actual cost <br />of constructing Wear Lane North and Wear Circle. <br />Barrett replied, "The issue as to what is taken involves <br />mainly the right of passage. The City is not picking up the road <br />and taking it elsewhere. The road materials that have been <br />placed there will remain. The expense of that road for Mr. Wear <br />is essentially the ongoing maintenance, which the City has agreed <br />to accept w!ien it becomes a public road. Historically, the <br />subdivider has had to bear the cost of developing a public road. <br />Mr. Wear is being treated no differently than any other <br />subdividers of property involving a public road. As a regulatory <br />matter, the City of Orono has already passed an Ordinance stating <br />that the City has the power to allow the public to cross over so <br />called private roads if the City deems it to be necessary. In <br />other words, that is an element of property which is able to be <br />regulated by the City's power." <br />Mayor Peterson asked Barrett whether he had spoken to Mr. <br />Wear or his legal counsel. <br />Barrett replied, "No, I have not. I do have a letter from <br />Mr. Wear's counsel that I received sometime ago. The letter <br />makes a claim of a taking, but I have not exchanged drafts or <br />otherwise tried to negotiate with him." <br />Councilmember Jabbour asked when the City had passed the <br />Ordinance stating that the public has the right to cross over <br />private roads. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.