My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
11-09-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 3:45:41 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 3:45:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 9, 1992 <br />MARINA LICENSE UPDATE — CONT. <br />Jabbour asked if, that is the City's project or Metropolitan Waste <br />Control Commission's. Mabusth indicated a portion of the project <br />was the City's responsibility. <br />Butler felt it is always best to try to work with the owners, but <br />when there is a situation where they won't even respond, the City <br />should initiate the denial resolution. <br />Goetten stated that North Shore and Lakeside Marinas have tried to <br />make an effort to comply with the City. She felt they should try <br />to continue to work together. <br />Callahan noted Mr. Dunn felt the plantings were the responsibility <br />of the City and Dunn also felt the curbing done was inadequate. <br />Gerhardson indicated that a portion of the plantings are the <br />responsibility of the City. <br />Gaffron noted it is not just a question of replacing trees that <br />were removed, but also plantings that were never put into place as <br />required by the City in 1981 with a previous application. He felt <br />the City should continue to try to work with North Shore and <br />Lakeside Marinas. <br />Mayor Peterson directed staff to draft a denial resolution for <br />Gayles Marina. <br />( #12) STYROFOAM ORDINANCE — TERMINOLOGY AMENDMENT <br />ORDINANCE #110, SECOND SERIES <br />Callahan agreed that the word "styrofoam" should be removed if <br />people are trying to maintain a brand name, but noted he thought <br />that was a general term. He asked if the substitute wording would <br />cover ail other similar products. <br />Gaffron noted the language incorporated is only intended to cover <br />polystyrene. <br />Jabbour noted other agencies have adopted very generic language to <br />cover potential products introduced. He added the Wisconsin DNR has <br />asked for immediate removal of styrofoam products. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Ordinance <br />#110, Second Series, and to direct staff to write a proper letter <br />containing proper language. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.