My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 3:42:41 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 3:42:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 <br />( #6) #1757 ALBERT D. HANSER, <br />1685 FOX STREET - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3175 <br />Albert Hanser and Jack Taylor were present. <br />Mabusth explained this is a request for a conditional use permit <br />for a guest house use. She noted the applicant has followed the <br />directives of the preliminary subdivision approval and have filed <br />the application. The structure is non - conforming because of its <br />substandard setback from a recreational development lake. The Issue <br />for this review is the requirement of the septic code to replace <br />the system if it is deemed non - conforming. She stated it has been <br />found non - conforming the based on septic test information received <br />for the rest 'of the property, mound systems would have to, be <br />installed on the property due to the high water table. The age of <br />the system suggests the required 3' separation could not be met. <br />The guest house currently has a standard trench system. Based on <br />code requirements, the system would have to be replaced within 12 <br />months. <br />Hanser stated he has lived in Orono for 20+ years and his property <br />is 35+ acres. He referred to a letter from Suilivans which attests <br />to the functionality of the septic system and .how it has been <br />maintained In the past. He said It would cost as much money to <br />prove the system meets the code as would a new system. He noted <br />they do not rent the guest house and their daughter lives there <br />now. He said he would be willing to make a written commitment that <br />they will continue to maintain the system as has been done in the <br />past. 'Hanser indicated the rules have changed dramatically since <br />they started the subdivision process and they have been caught In <br />the middle. <br />Taylor stated the Council should consider the rule, if it isn't <br />broken, don't fix it. He stated the septic system was installed per <br />the code effective at the time, which the current ordinance <br />requires. He noted Weckman indicated the system may be dumping <br />pollutants into the water, and Taylor asked whose responsibility <br />it was to prove. <br />Goetten said she asked the same question. She stated she was told <br />an on -site evaluator could clarify that issue for a couple hundred <br />dollars. She felt that would not be too much to ask. <br />Jabbour stated this is a policy question on non - conforming system. <br />He felt the applicant has presented a very good subdivision and <br />expressed a desire to work with him to resolve the issues. <br />Y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.