My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
09-14-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 3:42:41 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 3:42:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992- <br />( * #3) APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to approve the minutes <br />of the regular Council meeting of August 24, 1992. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public comments. <br />( #4) #1748 ROBERT & RITA HOVLAND, <br />1245 NORTH ARM DRIVE - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /VARIANCE <br />Rita Hovland was present. <br />Mabusth explained that the application was reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission at both the July and August meetings. Planning <br />Commission denied the amended proposal based on size of the <br />structure and the Planning Commission felt because of that size, <br />the structure should meet the setback ordinance. The building has <br />been reduced from 30'x33' to 25'x36'. Lot coverage was no longer <br />an issue. <br />Goetten suggested shifting the building thereby only requiring one <br />variance. She questioned the structure width of 25' and noted <br />boards come in 24' lengths. She stated it would be less expensive <br />to build the garage at a 24' width. <br />Jabbour noted the applicants may have felt they should not impose <br />more on one-of the adjacent neighbors. He asked Mrs. Hovland to <br />comment on Goetten's question.. <br />Hovland stated once the walls are up, a 24' wide garage would be <br />reduced to 23' of usable space inside and they need 24'. She <br />pointed out one Planning Commission member did vote for the <br />proposal because he felt they had followed the directives of the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Callahan referred to the minutes of the July 20th meeting where the <br />applicants stated the reason the large garage was needed was <br />because their son was moving into the house and has two vehicles <br />and a boat. He asked if the applicants were trying to make the <br />property hold more equipment than is feasible. <br />Hovland noted the graveled area has been reduced to one car width <br />and will be used more as a convenience as the garage is far from <br />the entrance to the front of the house. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.