My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
04-13-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 1:23:04 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 1:23:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD APRIL -13, 1992 <br />( #8) #1721 ALBERT HANSER, <br />1685 FOX STREET - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3107 <br />MerldIth Howell and Mark Gronberg were present to represent the <br />applicant. <br />Moorse explained that this is a five lot subdivision request. <br />Mabusth explained that the subdivision will be served by a private <br />road. The applicant has asked for special consideration to use the <br />existing curb cut that serves Lot 1 allowing for two accesses, and <br />the Planning Commission agreed because of the uniqueness of this <br />property. The lot line between Lots 1 and 2 will be realigned to <br />provide for 200' width at the shoreline. The guest house is <br />recognized as a non - conforming structure as it does not meet the <br />required 100' setback from the shoreline of Tanager Lake defined <br />at 929.4' elevation. Also, the septic system for the guest house <br />has not been located and the approval resolution will condition <br />that the septic system be replaced within one year of final plat <br />approval. <br />Jabbour asked why the' plan shows the property platted to Tanager <br />Lake. <br />Gronberg explained that it w i I'I be shown on the final p l at as a <br />wetland area with a drainage easement over the area. <br />Butler asked, if we would require a Flowage and Conservation <br />Easement also. <br />Mabusth confirmed that would be required. <br />Y- <br />,Goetten asked about the main drive encroaching the wetlands. <br />Mabusth explained that the wetland in that area has been defined <br />at the 932.3' elevation and that the 28' wide road w i I i be 26'+ <br />from,:the wetland elevation. <br />Goetten asked how far the guest house was from the�lot line. <br />Mabusth noted it is approximately 10', another reason to classify <br />the structure as non - conforming. <br />Goetten reiterated that this subdivision does not guarantee <br />riparian rights. <br />Butler asked how close the public crossing or fishing area of the <br />railroad track was to Lot 5. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.