My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-24-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
02-24-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 1:21:36 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD FEBRUARY 24, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1682 — CONT. <br />Jabbour reminded them that they are still not sure the garage will <br />meet building.code standards. <br />Callahan stated he does not feel responsible for the trusses. <br />Gaffron asked if the garage was to be moved over 7', how the garage <br />would function. <br />Brickley noted the door would be changed to the south side, but <br />reminded them that there are four other neighbors that use the <br />drive and it would be greatly reduced by the garage encroachment. <br />She reiterated that she would be willing to remove the 11'x32' <br />excess s I ab on the south and put up gutters on the west s i de i f <br />the garage was allowed to remain. <br />Gaffron asked about easements that the neighbors may have over the <br />shared drive. <br />Brickley stated the neighbors do not have an easement. <br />Gaffron asked if the garage was moved over 7', and the door moved <br />to the southern end, would the door be centered, and if so,.would <br />the driveway need to be added onto to allow accessibility to the <br />garage. <br />Callahan reiterated. that the Planning Commission reviewed this <br />i ssue on December 1 6th, and f I t that Counc i i shou I d not waste t i me <br />on planning. <br />Jabbour suggested they relay their concerns to staff. <br />There was no motion to reconsider the application. <br />( #6) SHORELAND REGULATION - ORDINANCE — ORDINANCE #101, 2ND SERIES <br />Moorse explained this is the ordinance drafted by the Lake Use <br />Committee and has been recommended for adoption by the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Goetten asked if they would be' moving too fast if they removed the <br />subdivision moratorium prior to the DNR approval of the ordinance. <br />Callahan stated that the DNR regulations did not need to be in <br />effect until fall of 1992. <br />2 <br />%z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.