Laserfiche WebLink
•j <br />PUBLIC HEARING HELD REGARDING DNR'S PROPOSED LAKE ACCESS <br />ON MAXWELL BAY <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 6, 1992 <br />Callahan opined that the LMCD's long -range development plan which <br />was recently adopted by the LMCD and approved by the Metropolitan <br />Council addressed the matter of 700 car parking around the lake <br />with access points, and regardless of what is mentioned in the <br />written portion of the plan, there was a great deal of discussion <br />about that program-and its concept during the course of the <br />development stage. He felt that the plan provides, that the <br />acquisition of access points on the lake to meet the 700 car <br />parking spaces would be the subject of a program which is to be <br />developed and coordinated by the LMCD. He noted that the DNR had <br />signed off on the long -range plan, and in earlier days, even had <br />input on it. <br />Callahan stated, that at the time the plan was developed, the <br />representatives of the cities with an interest in this area of <br />the plan were told that the LMCD and the DNR had reached some <br />understanding as to what was meant by the 700 parking space <br />requirement. Thereby, the DNR and the LMCD had agreed that since <br />the first studies had been made, that the LMCD would devise a <br />plan for the lake and work with surrounding communities to arrive <br />at a comprehensive solution to this problem. The current <br />activity with the DNR has been spurred by an individual wanting <br />to sell his house and the-DNR appeared to be an available source <br />of money. <br />Callahan felt that the LMCD should go to the DNR who they had <br />reached some compromise with in the past, and redefine the plan <br />for the lake in regards to the parking around the Lake., <br />Goetten explained that the Council is taking this issue every <br />seriously and called for an executive session to be held <br />following the next scheduled Council meeting. <br />Mayor Peterson noted to the public that the Council is on their <br />side with regards to this issue. She stated that she felt the <br />purpose of the DNR was to help preserve, not destroy, the-natural <br />resources. She felt the .proposed access is a very costly <br />venture. She felt that problems will be compounded by adding <br />boat density to the lake and traffic problems on surrounding <br />roads. <br />Jabbour introduced Gene Strommen, Executive Director of the LMCD <br />and Duane Marcus of Wayzata, Board Member.of the LMCD. <br />Jabbour explained that in Minnesota the. DNR is charged with <br />managing its resources, the MPCA is ..responsible for disasters, <br />and there is not an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to <br />protect, the environment. He. noted'.that the LMCD should be <br />charged -with this responsibility. <br />3 <br />