10-11-1993 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING • HELD OCTOBER 11, 1993 ZONING FILE #1854 CONT. Mabusth explained that the code does not require alternate testing for developed properties seeking improvements. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3337 for applicant Troy Anderson, 1490 Long Lake Boulevard, granting setback variances for construction of an attached garage. Ayes 5, Nays 0. ( * #6) #1855 PAUL E. BOWMAN, 3458 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3336 Mr. Bowman was present. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Hurr to adopt Resolution #3336 for applicant Paul E. Bowman, 3458 North Shore Drive, granting setback variances for construction of a second story above the existing residence. Ayes 5, Nays 0. ( #7) # 1857 JAMES L. STINSON, 2623 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES Mr. and Mrs. Stinson were present. Mabusth explained that applicant is proposing a principle structure addition to the lakeside of the residence along with a deck reconstruction adjacent to that addition. She explained further that the • greatest concern is that this addition of the principle structure extending into the average lakeshore setback could allow neighboring structures to expand lakeward without need of variances. Structure does meet the 75' setback however. Hurr asked why there is no date or signature on the survey provided and questions whether Council should use and depend on this survey. Mr. Stinson stated that this was the survey the building inspector provided to him. Kelley stated he would like to know from the applicant in writing what the hardship is. Hun stated she would like to know if there were any stipulations added at the time the deck was installed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Callahan, to send application back to the Planning Commission and have the applicants present the revised proposal and updated survey and state their hardships. Ayes 5, Nays 0. ( #8) #1859 JEFFREY D. MUELLER, 222 BEDERWOOD DRIVE - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3338 Mr. Mueller was present. Mabusth explained that applicant seeks a variance to side setback for a detached garage addition, and a variance allowing the accessory structure to be placed in front of the front line of the existing residence.