My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-1993 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
08-23-1993 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 12:54:22 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 12:54:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 23, 1993 • <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS - CONT. <br />PCI also indicated that it would be repaired when they had dry weather. Furchner felt there had <br />been 4 days of dry weather and something should have been done. Gerhardson told Furchner <br />that the person who said it would be repaired when there was dry weather did not have the <br />authority to give that information. Gerhardson explained that PCI does semi - finish grading on <br />all properties in the project and this has been done to Furchner's property as well. PCI will then <br />come back with pulverized dirt (topsoil) to complete the work before sod is placed. This has <br />not been done yet in any part of the project. Gerhardson was unaware that dirt had been used <br />from Furchner's property. Cook thought it would be the end of next week before PCI would <br />be able to get in to finish the topsoil and sodding. Goetten asked that an answer be given to Mr. <br />Furchner as soon as possible. Callahan asked that Furchner's property be completed and a <br />report given to Councilmembers by the next meeting, September 13, 1993. Hurr also asked for <br />information as to when Stubbs Bay Road would be completed. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />( 0) #1780 CITY OF ORONO, 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTION #3315 <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt the resolution presented except that <br />Item #3 from the findings of fact should be removed since the report by Schirmers is not • <br />pertinent to the resolution. <br />Kelley asked where people who want to use the park would park their vehicles. Callahan <br />understood there would be available parking in the southwest corner. Kelley asked at what point <br />the City would require this road to be paved and brought up to City standards. Mabusth stated <br />the subdivision regulations deal only with the trigger of residential units so if the residential lot <br />is subdivided, it would only be at the third lot, based on residential development, that would <br />require upgrading. She felt it would be up to the City to make that determination as the park <br />is developed. Kelley thought the park was acting like another residential unit. It is Callahan's <br />understanding that if the road benefits the property owners, they could be assessed their fair <br />portion. <br />Mabusth asked Council to provide direction on whether the landowner will be responsible for <br />sharing in the maintenance of the private driveway. An easement for the driveway is provided <br />on City land. Jabbour thought the City should maintain it in the summer but the homeowner <br />should plow in the winter. The City must maintain this drive to access the MWCC lift station. <br />Hurr asked if this drive was currently maintained by the City. Mabusth stated the issue of <br />maintenance was brought up at the Planning Commission meeting and was to be resolved by <br />staff. In discussions with the Public Works Department, they said they would assume <br />maintenance of the roadway. Gerhardson added that maintenance can be whoever arrives first. <br />2 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.