My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-1993 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
08-23-1993 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2019 12:54:22 PM
Creation date
4/29/2019 12:54:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 23, 1993 • <br />MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT - CONT. <br />F) Hurr referred to the recent hearing for disciplinary action of a City employee. She noted <br />that one of things not in the findings was that there be some notification in the paper that <br />pending action was not upheld by the City Council. She asked that Goetten, who chaired the <br />committee, review this notice. <br />G) Jabbour stated they are very active in trying to bring in new enabling legislation for the <br />LMCD. He talked with the DNR regarding the report of the Task Force. He wants it noted <br />that the City of Orono has a minority opinion included. Hurr thought it unrealistic to expect <br />something by the end of September but probably by the end of the year. <br />POLICE CHIEF REPORT <br />Sullivan provided a statistical update through the end of June. It shows the activity is virtually <br />the same as last year. He expects July and August to be about the same as last year also. Part <br />1 refers to Felonies (8 of the most serious crimes as designated by the FBI), Part 2 includes <br />other crimes (petty theft, misdemeanor, criminal damage to property, etc.), Part 3 is traffic with <br />the exception of DWIs included in Part 2, and Parts 4 and 5 deal with service calls (medical <br />accidents, found property, etc.). The information sheet will be provided on a monthly basis for <br />future reference. The purpose of the report is to compare the previous year's activity and look • <br />at the contract cities. The report tracks ICRs. Each time the Police Department receives a call <br />for service or they self - initiate an activity, an ICR (Initial Complaint Report) is written. Routine <br />jobs such as delivering Council packets are not written as ICRs. State reports would give <br />greater detail if required. Sullivan noted most people who have things stolen from their yards <br />do not recover them. 4 out of 5 burglaries are not solved nationally. <br />Kelley asked how information could be supplied to the City Council on performance of the <br />officers. Sullivan responded that it is difficult to evaluate but some indicators are absence of <br />complaints and presence of letters of thank you. It is difficult to evaluate how many crimes are <br />prevented by having patrol cars in the City. Hurr asked if there were yearly evaluations done <br />on officers. Sullivan confirmed there were. <br />Hurr asked if these same reports were given to contract cities. Sullivan replied that they <br />received these same reports with a chronological listing of all calls. Each of the cities works <br />with this information a little differently. Hurr asked -for more detailed information on the Orono <br />report since it is available. Jabbour noted the local papers give detailed reports. <br />10 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.