Laserfiche WebLink
C� <br />MINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD MAY 24, 1993 <br />1993 MARINA LICENSES - CONT. <br />Resolution #938, ref <br />adoption, coupled wit <br />if the operation of t <br />the environment or n <br />leads to a conclusion <br />to 50 boat addition. <br />boat density does cre <br />be a conflict in i <br />recommends that based <br />77 slips, and not rei <br />He noted the B -2 zon i r <br />but does not address <br />past practice of reco <br />arenced in every license issued since that <br />i the existing code sections which state that <br />ie marina is to be a detriment to the lake or <br />�ighbors, the license should not be issued, <br />that no license should be granted for the 30 <br />Resolution #938 states that increasing the <br />ite an environmental problem. He felt that to <br />;suing a license for the extra slips. He <br />on this analysis a license be issued for the <br />;ognize the additional boat storage on land. <br />g section of the code discusses dock lengths, <br />)oat density. His concern is that in light of <br />inizinq Dast boat density. if boat density is <br />not addressed with these license applications, the City may not <br />maintain continuity and may give up some authority it may want to <br />maintain. <br />Mayor Callahan asked if the three applications in question directly <br />related to the number of boats. <br />Gaffron replied all of them are historically related to boat <br />density, and the form and fee schedule used for the application are <br />tied to boat density prohibiting an increase in density. <br />Mayor Callahan felt the issue was properly brought to the attention <br />of the City and the staff's analysis of the history is correct. He <br />felt the thrust of the regulation suggested in Resolution #938 is <br />related to length of docks, not boat density. The Lake Use <br />Committee came to the belief that the City ought to regulate the <br />marinas as a business and as such confine efforts to ensure they <br />do not engage in activities which might be considered nuisances, <br />and regulate them in actual use of the land similar to the way <br />other land owners are regulated. Consideration was given to whether <br />the B -2 section of the code should be revised, and that is under <br />consideration at the Planning Commission level. The two issues that <br />the Committee was concerned about was that the land use be in <br />accordance with the general views of the City and the marinas do <br />not act in such a way as to be a nuisance or obtrusive in the <br />neighborhood. One major issue to consider is adequate parking. <br />Specifically, the Lake Use Committee did not want to regulate the <br />number of boats at the marina, and more specifically did not want <br />to regulate dry stacking. The Committee generally believed that the <br />marinas should be allowed to run as a business in any way deemed <br />useful. He felt that marinas, kept within those parameters, were <br />des ireable within the City and serve a useful purpose in getting <br />the public on the lake. <br />16 <br />