My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3485
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 3400 - 3499 (March 14, 1994 - November 28, 1994)
>
Resolution 3485
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2019 2:13:58 PM
Creation date
4/26/2019 2:13:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
O CITY of ORONO <br /> r �> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> NO. 348 ' <br /> xo¢�G <br /> s <br /> A. Applicants were granted a conditional use permit for church use in 1970 <br /> on this 1.3 acre property. A church building and parking lot were <br /> subsequently constructed. <br /> B. In 1970 a parking lot was proposed to include 52 parking stalls to meet <br /> the City requirement for 1 stall per 4 persons based on a 200 person <br /> capacity building. That parking lot was constructed somewhat smaller <br /> than the proposed plan. <br /> C. Church use has expanded to a level where parking overflows onto Togo <br /> Road which is extremely narrow and not suited for parking. <br /> D. The proposed parking lot expansion will add approximately 4,850 s.f. of <br /> parking area which will accomodate at least 13 additional vehicles if <br /> properly striped. <br /> E. The proposed parking lot expansion increases hardcover on the property <br /> from 35% to 43%, where only 35% would be allowed in the 500-1,000' <br /> hardcover setback zone. <br /> F. The parking lot will add to the runoff accumulation from the 30 acre <br /> watershed upstream from a deteriorated drain tile on the adjacent <br /> property. Per the City Engineer's recommendation, it would be <br /> appropriate that the applicants improve drainage by construction of a <br /> swale or culvert along applicants' east property line to alleviate the <br /> potential for flooding of the adjacent property. <br /> G. Applicants applied for and were granted a building permit for a 10'x11' <br /> coat room addition and 14'x18' carport in December 1993. The <br /> inspections department erroneously did not call out the need for a <br /> conditional use permit, which normally would be required for such <br /> additions to a church in a residential zone. <br /> H. Those additions were constructed and the caiport was constructed to <br /> extend 22' east from the existing church building rather than the 14' <br /> approved plan, and therefore extended to a point 47' from the east <br /> property line where a 50' setback would normally be required for a <br /> church structure existing as a conditional use permit in a residential zone. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> Fa 5005 Disk 0' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.