Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 12, 1"4 <br />( #8 - #1980 - A&T Development - Continued) <br />Mabusth reported the application was for a area and lot width variance to allow an • <br />undeveloped parcel to be developed. The property is bounded by Tonkawa Road to the <br />east and Park Avenue to the west. The property is made up of four independent parcels <br />that have each been assessed V4 sewer unit. The parcels must be legally combined before <br />a building permit can be issued. Park Avenue which is an unimproved dedicated right -of- <br />way will now service three residential units. The Engineer had originally recommended <br />the road be upgraded to a 24' paved width. The three Planning Commission members <br />recommended approval and that the City Engineer be directed to provide an alternative <br />plan for use of the 30' width right-of-way for turnaround use. Gerhardson had advised <br />the City maintains Park Avenue up to the second residential driveway. If the roadway is <br />to be maintained by the City up to the proposed third residential drive, then the plan must <br />be revised to serve maintenance vehicles with the north radius at the intersection of the <br />new curb cut at 20' and the southerly comer at a 10' radius. The turnaround is provided <br />by extending the travelled roadway of Park Avenue a minimum of 30' northerly of the <br />curb cut to the newly developed lot. <br />Mabusth stated if the road is to be maintained by the City, the turnaround for <br />maintenance vehicles must be required. If the road is to go to the second driveway only, <br />maintenance would stop at that point and future owners would be responsible for <br />maintenance of future driveway located within Park Avenue. The applicant would prefer <br />this option. <br />• <br />Jabbour asked for clarification of the code in reference to a 80' turnaround requirement. <br />Mabusth said this would indeed refer to a new subdivision. In this case, the Engineer <br />proposed an alternative plan as we are dealing with a platted right of way of 30'. <br />The Applicant said he was satisified with the present maintenance and size of the road <br />and would like to maintain the private driveway. He is concerned with loss of trees with <br />the taking of an additional 30' of land. Mabusth said that the City would not be taking <br />additional land but just redoing what is the public right -of -way. <br />Callahan asked for and received no public comment, thus closing the public hearing. <br />In discussion, Mabusth indicated there is yet another parcel in this area that could be <br />developed and would be accessed through this road Cook said the sanitary sewer runs <br />up to the middle of the lot, and the required turnaround would not be extended beyond <br />that point, also noting that the only trees present within this corridor are scrub trees. <br />Kelley moved, Hurr seconded, to approve Resolution #3506, Application #1980, for lot <br />width and area variances with access as outlined in the City Engineer's report. Ayes 4, <br />Nays 0. <br />• <br />4 <br />