10-10-1994 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 10, 1994 (Item #12 - Bangert - Continued) • Gaffron said the Planning Commission looked at the property and agreed that the eastside entry to the property with driveway going across the front slope and up into the property on the westside is the best of the choices available. None of the options are ideal but this particular one would have the least impact on slope, grading, and vegetation. The Commission recommended denial and felt consideration should be given to alternative access through an easement with a neighbor. Callahan said we can't ask the applicant to obtain an easement. Goetten commented that by giving this property access to sewer, the City deemed the property to be a buildable lot, requiring the Council to work with the applicant in finding a workable solution. Larson said the option of an easement from a neighbor was not feasible. One neighbor, when approached on the subject, asked $30,000 for the easement. The other two neighbors have their property for sale and an easement would be a hindrance to either sale. Cook said going straight in would be a better alternative as far as navigation but would ruin the landscape. Gaffron also said there would be huge retaining walls or wide cuts in that scenario. Screening would help to protect headlight reflection. Winter conditions could be treacherous but navigable. Cook also said the present plan would cause the • least amount of destruction to vegetation_ • Gaffron reported the County Engineer required the driveway to enter within 70 feet of the east side of the lot. The DNR is concerned with this project and stated in their letter of 9/29 that the requested variances be denied due to the considerable grading and removal of vegetation. Planning Commissioner Nolan commented on the loss of trees, but said if there were no other means, this was the best plan. Safety was still an issue and suggested possibly heating part of the driveway. Jabbour asked if a landing would be appropriate. Gaffron said if it was feasible, it would make sense. Roeloff responded that the 8% grade was not excessive and the rise of 9' is over the length of 115'. There would also be a flat spot in the bend to allow a car to reassess their drive. Hun brought to the Council's attention that the driveway as proposed will cut into the right of way. Goetten remarked on the need for the applicant to work with the City on tree replacement. Barrett noted the DNR has the right to sue the City over a resolution of approval but the City can only ask the property owner to consider an easement with neighbors, but not require it.