Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1994 <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS • <br />Park Commissioner Vongries requested the City Council be present at the Park <br />Commission meeting of 10/3/94 to discuss the park survey. Park Commissioner Ilse <br />asked that time be left during that meeting to allow for other business. Ilse reported a <br />letter of appreciation will be drafted and sent to the volunteers in the Adopt -a -Park <br />program. <br />Jabbour asked of the status of the little league parks, which were found to be moving on <br />pace. Callahan said the concession building and fence will be in place by the end of the <br />month. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Representative Schroeder had no comments. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Park Commissioner Ilse asked for direction in answering questions from the public in <br />reference to the Stubbs Bay/Hwy 12 intersection where a number of accidents as well as <br />deaths have occurred. Callahan stated this area is on the mind of the Highway Dept, who <br />wants to expand County Road b between, as well as beyond, Hwy 12 and Townline Rd. • <br />Jabbour suggested the use of the official detour. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />(#4) #1860 ZELMA MCKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - APPLICANT'S <br />REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT <br />Mabusth stated the applicant is requesting reconsideration of the payment of a sewer and <br />water unit charge for a second unit. The City approved a multi -use dwelling application <br />in 1993. McKinney's daughter, Gayle Siegler, and Attorney, Gary Eidsen, were present. <br />Eidsen described McKinney's poor health and financial hardship. Eidsen stated there has <br />been no change in the multi use status of the property since 1962 which is the hallmark of <br />this issue. Eidsen stated the applicant has met the requirements of the conditional use <br />permit, and the SAC and WAC charges are new charges, although there has been no <br />changes in the use of the property. Eidsen sees no basis for these fees. The Waste <br />Commission told applicant the charges should be grandfathered in. The City disputes <br />this; citing an example in a follow -up letter of another property, which Eidsen says is not <br />representative of this specific property. Eidsen feels the charges are unprecedented, <br />unwarranted, and create a hardship. • <br />