Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD <br />. AUGUST 8, 1994 <br />Home Occupation License - 650 North Brown Road - Continued <br />and that the home occupation happen within the dwelling. Staff feels there is a conflict because <br />a proposed 1600 s.f. garage would house equipment to be used in the lawn care and snow <br />removal business and employed assistants would come to the property to pick up trucks or work <br />on equipment that is not within the principal structure. Staff would recommend denial since all <br />standards are not met. One option Council may choose is to direct the applicant to apply for <br />a variance if Council is favorable to allowing the home occupation. "Home occupation" is listed <br />as an accessory use, therefore a variance would be required to the performance standards for an <br />allowed accessory use. <br />Garrett commented that he had spent much time with Mabusth and questioned if the home <br />occupation license was necessary. He intends to build the garage whether the home occupation <br />license is granted or not. He responded to concerns stated in the staff memo. He would store <br />off - season equipment in the garage. He has explained to the neighbors in the town homes his <br />plans. The 28' enclosed trailer he owns will be stored off -site at the new Long Lake Power <br />Equipment building, of which he is a third owner. Employees will park at Long Lake Power <br />Equipment while doing their daily work. He does have an office in his home to do paperwork <br />and handle phone calls. He agreed there may be some excess fuel storage. He felt the impact <br />• on neighboring properties was minimal as the garage will be designed similar to the home and <br />will have screening with evergreens on three sides. He did not feel there would be complaints <br />of noise at odd hours in the wintertime because he would only be starting his own truck to go <br />to work at 2:00 a.m. Exhaust odors would not be created by the pickup. Traffic on the <br />driveway serving the town homes would only be two cars in the wintertime to carpool to the <br />snow removal equipment and the cars would be parked in the garage. He stated the neighboring <br />town homes had no major objections to his plans. The home occupation would not be visible <br />from the street because he lives on a private road and his lot is 1200' deep (almost 4 acres) with <br />the proposed garage midway down the driveway. He would not need or want any signs. There <br />are no products that he sells, only service. He would only store tools not used on a daily basis <br />in the garage. <br />Garrett commented on the staff review of home occupations since 1985. He felt there would <br />be much less traffic in his business than a manicuring service. Building contractors would have <br />equipment stored on site for their business. Finally, he objected to the statement "uses that <br />involve trucks, equipment, and employees coming and going generally have resulted in <br />complaints." He thought this presumed he was guilty of violations before being given a chance. <br />Goetten asked if there would be room for storage of off - season equipment at the Long Lake <br />Power Equipment building. Garrett responded there would not be room as this was an entirely <br />separate business for retail sales of outdoor equipment. He presently stores equipment at 2285 <br />Daniels Street in Long Lake and operates from there. Garrett added he would have personal <br />• equipment to store in the garage as well as business equipment. <br />7 <br />