My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-1994 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
06-13-1994 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 12:52:15 PM
Creation date
4/25/2019 12:52:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 13, 1994 <br />( #6) #1885 - LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2675 SIXTH AVENUE • <br />NORTH - SKETCH PLAN REVIEW (CONTINUED) <br />Kelley stated that he took issue at the statement that the land did not have amenities as other <br />areas of the City, and thus would be more difficult to develop. He felt the fact that the property <br />abutted a major highway was an issue for creating a transition area. If the highway does not end <br />up in this location, that would remove the need for that transition area. He stated that not all <br />land in Orono was developable. He noted that the City Council was not responsible for the <br />developer's expenses and if it could not be developed at a reasonable cost, that was unavoidable. <br />Hurr commented that the reason for having the multiple residential zoning classification was to <br />provide alternative and affordable housing for Orono residents. Discussion ensued regarding <br />where the high density residential portion of the project should be located. <br />Goetten stated she felt that the proposed 44 unit density was too high, but she would like to see <br />the developer rework his plans and come back to the City with a revised proposal. Jabbour <br />noted that the Council agreed with the PUD zoning designation, and he hoped that the developer <br />would be able to achieve a 2 acre density. Forbord stated they would contemplate the comments <br />made by the Council. <br />Hurr noted that she did not have a conflict of interest in this proposal because her sister was <br />involved with legal representation only for the applicant, but had no financial investment in the • <br />project. <br />( *#7) #1904 ERIC AND SHELLY LELJEQUIST, 3490 BIRCH LANE - CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT /VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution No. approving #1904 <br />Conditional Use Permit /Variance for Eric and Shelly Liljequist at 3490 Birch Lane. Ayes 4, <br />nays 0. <br />( #8) #1915 GEORGE APPLEBAUM, 4109 HIGHWOOD ROAD, VARIANCE <br />Mabusth reviewed the proposal and the recommendation made by the Planning Commission. <br />George Applebaum was present and noted that the steps shown on the plan were necessary in <br />order to maintain the landscaping, which is extensive on the property, because of the steep <br />slopes. Goetten stated she found it difficult to approve the request because of the large amount <br />of hardcover on the property. Applebaum stated that they concentrated on removing hardcover <br />area in the 0 -75 setback area. Hurr stated there should be more hardcover reduction on the <br />property, and she agreed with Goetten. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.