Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE RECONVENED BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING <br />• HELD MAY 9, 1994 <br />John C Ericson 1620 Shadywood Road 17- 117 -23 21 0012, stated he received a letter from <br />the Assessor recommending no change from the valuation of $261,000. He felt the land value <br />went up too much at $21,000 and thought 3 -4% was adequate. Erickson stated the increase was <br />about the same as other similar properties adding that some were adjusted closer to the channel. <br />Kelley asked how the Assessor arrived at an 11 % average increase. Erickson replied that the <br />buildings were calculated with the new rates. In order to bring the property class up to the 93 % <br />Hennepin County minimum, an increase of 7 % + would be required. Properties are then <br />reviewed by bays, value increments, etc. It was determined that the higher priced houses <br />probably were 10% low. Few of the higher priced homes sold so the class was raised <br />across - the - board. For example, on Park Drive a home sold for $292,000 in September of 1992 <br />and again in February of 1994 for $335,000. Ericson stated that he wanted to rebuild 6 -7 years <br />ago and was turned down by Council. He then did some remodeling for which he was assessed. <br />He thought the off -lake properties should be assessed more rather that having 8 -9 % for lakeshore <br />vs. 1.4 % for non - lakeshore. Erickson responded that there were years in the early 1980's where <br />lakeshore properties were low. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to approve the recommendation of the Assessor at <br />$261,000. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />Delores Petti iece 3540 North Shore Drive 08- 117 -23 43 0011, stated the increase from <br />• $81,000 to $95,000 in three years was too great. She noted the house was small and an unusual <br />shape. There is a road that crosses between the house and the lake. Oldtimers knew that <br />properties like this did not pay the same high taxes as those directly on the lake. Mayor <br />Callahan noted the increase was due to the land as in other properties. Hun added the building <br />value actually decreased. Kelley thought a 50' lot with a road in front could be lowered to the <br />1994 valuation. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor <br />at $95,000. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />David Verville 4209 North Shore Drive 07- 117 -23 43 0005, stated his valuation went up <br />$10,000 which is a 7.5 % increase and he thought that was too much for one year. He felt a 4 % <br />increase was enough for one year. Mayor Callahan stated that as long as the general increase <br />falls within the range of the average, the Assessor's recommendation should be equitable. <br />Verville stated that houses across the street from his (non - lakeshore) did not sell for more than <br />they did in 1986. He felt the lakeshore properties always received the largest and first increases. <br />Erickson indicated the 1984 valuation was $121,000 on this property but went down to $110,000 <br />in 1985. Two years later the valuations were raised again but this followed the real estate <br />market. He stated that one way to approach the property increases is to talk to state legislators. <br />It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hun, to accept the recommendation of the City <br />• Assessor at $144,000. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />2 <br />