04-11-1994 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1994 • ( *#8) #1908 DAVID CARLSON, 620 BIG ISLAND - CUP /VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3410 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3410 approving #1908 Conditional Use Permit and Variances for David Carlson at 620 Big Island. Ayes 5, nays 0. (#9) #1910 ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT #278, 795 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - CUP - RESOLUTION NO. 3411 Mabusth reviewed the staff report and noted that there is another improvement that the school failed to include with the application. This requires a variance for the location of the concession /storage building which is proposed to be 12' x 12' and will be located 45' from the western lot line. This will require a 5' variance. Neal Lawson reviewed the proposal and explained why the proposed structure required the variance. Hurr noted she was not comfortable approving a variance which had not been advertised and of which the public had not been notified. Jabbour stated he felt that the applicant should go through the variance approval process, but he was prepared to approve the conditional use permit as requested. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley to adopt Resolution No. 3411 approving #1910 • Conditional Use Permit for Orono School District #278 at 795 Old Crystal Bay Road and the variance request shall be processed through the Planning Commission as required by ordinance. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( #10) RICHARD R. HANSEN - REQUEST TO AMEND DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR FOXWOOD SECOND ADDITION Mabusth reviewed the petitioners request that the developer's agreement be amended to allow the road to be constructed only at the time a building permit is issued for Lot 2. Mr. Hanson was asking permission to allow a building permit to be issued for Lot 1. Larry Berg, representing Mr. Hansen, stated he understood that shared driveways were permitted in the City. He stated the City could not issue a building permit for Lot 2 without the road being constructed. He explained that there was no money available to construct the road at this time but that Lot 1 could be sold if the purchasers could develop it. He explained that they had the assurance from the DNR that Lot 2 would be deemed buildable, but that was not yet officially established. Hurr stated that the Council had approved the subdivision and the DNR had been asked to reclassify the upper basin of French Lake. She felt that the road should be constructed as originally required. Discussion ensued regarding the potential buildability of Lot 2 and the developer's economic hardship. Berg maintained that Lot 2 was not buildable until the roadway was constructed, • so the City would not be risking anything by permitting a building permit to be issued for 5