My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-27-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-27-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:57:21 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 9:57:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER-211 9 I9o5 <br />( #1 - Assessment Hearing - Willow Drive North - Continued) • <br />Hurr asked where Orono Plaza property is located and the acreage comparison between <br />the two commercial properties. Gustafson pointed out on a map the northwest quadrant <br />of Hwy 12 and Willow where the Orono Plaza property is located. Rice said the Orono <br />Plaza property consists of 56 acres but was unaware of the amount of acreage for the <br />Otten property, which he did say was smaller in size. <br />Callahan informed the public of the letter received from Otten voicing his opposition to <br />the assessment. <br />Jabbour said the street was designed as it is because of the commercial properties, and <br />some improvements that were made would not, otherwise, be needed. Gustafson <br />explained that as part of the Hwy 12 reconstruction project, the semaphore was matched <br />with the traffic to the south. A right lane was added to direct traffic to the east to the <br />Otten property, made wider, and for year- around use to withstand the weight of trucks <br />using the commercial properties. Kelley added that the roadway was designed to <br />accommodate the future service road servicing these properties. Gustafson said a median <br />would be built to line up with the frontage road also. Gustafson said the road design was <br />such to handle the increase of traffic benefiting the commercial properties which, <br />otherwise, would not have been needed. <br />Cliff Otten, owner of the other commercial property, arrived at this time. He noted that • <br />his letter stipulated a starting time for the hearing of 7:00 p.m., which he showed to the <br />Council. Let it be noted that the affidavit of publication showed a starting time of 6:45 <br />p.m. <br />Otten said he spoke with Moorse about the assessment. He was informed that the <br />assessment amount was 25% of the total cost. Otten said he does not receive 25% of the <br />benefit of the project. He added that Willow Drive was the only north -south link and <br />only through street maintained in the area. Otten said Moorse had informed him that the <br />rest of Willow Drive would be improved at some time with no assessment. Moorse was <br />reported to have said the other project would not be as extensive and would require <br />overlays about every five years. Otten said if this is true, the cost of additional overlays <br />over a period of time would reach that of the improvement under discussion. <br />There were no additional public comments, and Callahan closed the public hearing. <br />• <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.