Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 14,1995 46 <br />Hurr asked how the $15,000 amount was calculated. Moorse explained there was a formula used <br />based on the City's tax base. There would be no financial responsibility in 1996, but the $15,000 <br />obligation would start in 1997. It does not have to be spent on new housing. <br />Hurr did not feel there was a problem with affordable housing, noting areas such as Crystal Bay and <br />Navarre with housing under $115,000. <br />Kelley asked if the money could be spent on other improvements such as sewer or roads which <br />would also make housing more affordable in some areas. Moorse felt arguments could be made to <br />support such cases. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelly, to adopt Resolution #3641 Participation in the <br />Metropolitan Liveable Communities Act Local Housing Incentive Program. Vote: 3 ayes, 0 nays. <br />Mayor Callahan did not vote. <br />Status of Potential Neighborhood Sewer Projects and MUSA Amendment Application <br />Gaffron referred to the November 13, 1995 and October 18, 1995 memos as well as a draft copy of <br />the MUSA Amendment Application. <br />Gaffron gave an update of responses from the neighborhoods. North Long Lake and the Long Lake <br />Country Club have not officially responded but both are going through a petition process. Orono <br />Orchards has not responded at all. Bay Ridge has submitted a petition for sewer dated October 19, <br />1995. Foxhill submitted a letter representing the Foxhill subdivision (not in favor) but not the <br />Shoreline Drive residents (some favor sewer). A building permit was denied at 1860 Shoreline <br />Drive due to a non - conforming septic system which needs to be upgraded at the time of a building <br />permit application. The owners requested consideration to begin their project pending possible <br />sewer installation in the near future. Edgewood Hills is in favor of pursuing the possibility. Fox <br />Ridge and East Long Lake have given no response. Bracketts Point has submitted 11 of 12 petitions <br />in favor of sewer. One resident has not responded but indicated he may be in favor under certain <br />conditions. Webber Hills has submitted a petition also. 28 out of 34 are in favor of sewer (not the <br />100% the City would like to see to make a commitment). Jim Dillman has requested consideration <br />as his property on Willow Drive is adjacent to a sewered area. There are other similar cases <br />throughout the City. <br />Gaffron noted the MUSA Amendment Application has some blanks which need to be completed. <br />He referred to the "Non- Related Issues" listed at the end of the application. Met Council has asked <br />the City to discuss transportation, housing, stormwater management, etc. as part of the MUSA <br />application but these are really not related to the sewer issues. <br />2 • <br />