Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 <br />( #13 - 92079 Rick Perry - Continued) <br />• <br />Mabusth noted the elevations of the property. The ability to gain access to the rear of the <br />property is very tight. The only gently sloped area is in the rear and is needed as an <br />alternate septic site. This leaves the only suitable area for expansion within the street <br />yard. <br />The amended addition at 20'x22' would be redesigned to minimize the height from the <br />street and side. Mabusth noted that all of the neighbors have signed off on their <br />acknowledgement forms. <br />Callahan and Goetten said they were both at the Planning Commission meeting and did <br />not feel that the Planning Commission erred in their actions. <br />Callahan commented that the addition is the same as requested in the 1970's. Mabusth <br />said the additional area is needed for the applicant's collector cars and storage needs of a <br />maturing family. <br />Jabbour said he saw enough hardship to place the structure in front of the principal <br />structure with the narrowness of the lot for a side setback variance. He believes the <br />applicant has the right to the garage, and the location is satisfactory due to the <br />topography of the land. <br />is Mabusth said the Planning Commission questioned how much accessory structure should <br />be necessary. She did note, however, that the addition would still keep property under <br />the allowed total area for accessory structures on this property. <br />Callahan said an approval would not be granted for other reasons such as business use if <br />not used for the applicant's collection. Perry said it was his desire to keep his vehicles <br />and equipment stored inside. He would like to remain living on this property and would <br />be willing to enter into a covenant calling for elimination of the structure if he moved. <br />Goetten said she was concerned with additional structure. Perry said the property would <br />not support any more structure. <br />Jabbour said he had no problem with the application. <br />Mabusth noted the applicant proposes reduction in structure size, the planting of <br />landscaping and minimizing the roof line. She also said the applicant was willing to <br />execute a covenant to remove the structure if he moved. The Council did not want such <br />a covenant. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Application #2079 and directed Staff to <br />prepare a formal resolution for Council action at the November 27, 1995, meeting. Vote: <br />• Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />11 <br />