My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
10-23-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:52:24 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 9:52:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 23, 1995 <br />• ( #12 - County Road 15 Project - Continued) <br />Callahan asked what the County required at this time. Grube said he anticipated <br />receiving a resolution of support for the project. Grube said the County would then <br />normally begin formalizing the plans and specifications keeping in contact with City Staff <br />and returning at a later date to discuss the right -of -way acquisition costs. <br />Hurr said she was in support of both parts of the project. The cost estimate of $62,000 <br />compared to approving a $32,000 overlay for the north end of Willow is an amount that <br />would far more benefit Orono residents according to Hurr. <br />Goetten said the City would gain a better understanding once the second phase of the <br />project design was completed. <br />Jabbour said he understood the need for a moral commitment from the City to proceed <br />with the project. <br />Grube said it would take months to complete the plans, and he would not return before <br />the Council for some time. It was noted that the County would incur thousands of <br />dollars in costs to execute the final plans for the project. Grube said he understood the <br />County would have to explain any major changes in cost and would work with Staff <br />during the planning process. <br />• Callahan said he would agree with the County proceeding with the study. The Council <br />would need to vote on the final costs when they are determined. <br />• <br />Jabbour said he felt the County has done what they said they would, but asks that the <br />County find alternate mitigation sites as he feels the City should not give up the land for <br />mitigation for a sum of only $7,500. Polaczyk said if there became the need to go <br />outside of the City for wetland mitigation, the costs would change_ <br />Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3626. Grube said it was the <br />requirement of the County Board to ask the City to tentatively identify the source of <br />funds for the project. Callahan reported that the funds would be through tax dollars. He <br />indicated no tax increment financial district was involved. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( * #13) ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL - HIGHWAY 12 SEWER WATER <br />PROJECT PHASE H - RESOLUTION #3636 <br />Hun moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3636, adopting the assessment roll <br />for sewer and water improvement - phase II on the north side of Highway 12, between <br />Brown Road North and Willow Drive. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.