Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 23, 1995 <br />(Dr. Mich - School Referendum - Continued) <br />Kelley asked if the operating costs were projected to increase. Mich said the operating <br />• <br />costs would increase by $200,000 per year out of a $14 million operating budget. This <br />amount is paid by tax dollars but the school district cannot go back to the taxpayer and <br />asked for the additional $200,000. The state tells the school district what amount they <br />can levy. The state has withdrawn contributions to education when the State has <br />financial problems which has produced less money for the schools on which to operate. <br />Callahan remarked the people who turn out for voting for a referendum are generally not <br />a true representation of the general populous. It was his opinion that the majority of a <br />small minority of people make the decision. Callahan said he was concerned with people <br />losing the ability to pay their increasingly high taxes. The bond would increase the taxes <br />further by 9%. Callahan felt that the school district was budgeting for what they want <br />and not necessarily what is needed. He was concerned that the general taxpayer did not <br />understand the tax ramifications involved. <br />Mich responded that in a referendum, it was one of the few times the people actually <br />make the decision rather than delegating decisions to those they elect. He agreed that the <br />tax system was unfair, especially to the metropolitan area, and there was a need to work <br />with the legislature in making changes. Mich said he needed to work with the givens and <br />look at the students and at what was best for the next century. He said it was his <br />responsibility to inform the public and listen to their response. If the response by voting • <br />was no, he would need to figure out what that meant. <br />Callahan commented on the recent park survey and how it reflects on the school's swing <br />to involving community activities in their buildings. When the citizens were surveyed on <br />spending money for activity fields, the majority did not wish to do so. He noted that the <br />hockey and little league association paid for their facilities with money from those people <br />interested in these activities. Callahan questioned whether this could be done with other <br />group interests. <br />Mich said if the referendum fails, the usage of the activity fields by other interests would <br />be decreased. He noted if these community interests were not at the school doors, they <br />would be at the City's looking for alternatives. Mich said athletics was not the issue but <br />the need to provide wholesome activities, which involves athletics. <br />10 <br />