Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1995 <br />( #5 - 92058 Ron Rantz/Autografs, Inc. - Continued) <br />• <br />Goetten said she was not against the application but rezoning was a problem. <br />Jabbour said if the applicant thought there would be no need to expand, he was excited <br />about the design and would like to have these people living and working in the area. He <br />said rezoning was a totally different issue. <br />Mabusth commented that if conceptual approval was given, Staff would bring back to the <br />Council a resolution, which would outline any additional paperwork needed. <br />Council informed the applicant that if they proceeded with the application now and then <br />meanwhile addressed the rezoning issue, it would save time. Waters questioned whether <br />the Council five years down the road would look differently at the request for rezoning if <br />it was not addressed now. He questioned whether the applicant would be told he should <br />have addressed it during the initial application. Jabbour said the value of the <br />development is not taken into consideration during rezoning. <br />Rantz said he has spoken with the neighbors informing them of his design for the building <br />and the setting on the property. He said he is concerned with issues of wetlands and trees <br />and desired to maintain this natural look. His only question is what can be done with the <br />back lot. He knows he benefits from the residental lot by the building placement on the <br />• combined lots. <br />Bichanich said with the 235' of length of the residential lot and requesting only the use of <br />35, he is unaware of what exactly can be done with the lot. Jabbour noted that any <br />zoning variances are only good for a year, and if a variance were to be granted, it would <br />not be an option in this application if expansion is not planned for the immediate time <br />period. <br />C7 <br />Jabbour reiterated that the conservation easement would be required, which allows no <br />building on the residential lot. He further added that the conservation easement should <br />be subject to a zoning change if one should happen. Mabusth said the conservation <br />easement could be amended if rezoning occurred and stipulated in the resolution. <br />Gaffron commented the present Council could not bind a future Council but should make <br />them aware of what are the present intentions. Rezoning would not be an individual <br />benefit but would affect the whole area. <br />Hurr suggested to the applicant that he get together with the other Navarre business <br />owners and lead a rezoning effort if that was the consensus of the group. <br />5 <br />