08-28-1995 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 28,1995 (#4 - #2033 Donald & Arlene Kielley - Continued) • Hurr said the back up area calculated at about 36' was more than was needed in order to back up safely and proceed forward unto CoRd 19. Hurr suggested the excess of 140 s.f of hardcover could be reduced in this area so that hardcover would not be increased. The applicant said there is no parking allowed on CoRd 19, and this driveway area is used for parking and for turnaround. Jabbour and Goetten concurred with the problems of parking. Hurr said she would still like to see more concessions done to reduce the 140 s.f of hardcover. Jabbour moved, Hun seconded, to approve the amended proposal provided applicant move the garage out of the right -of -way and work with Staff to reduce the hardcover by 140 s.f. Kelley noted that if the garage was moved and found to no longer be structurally sound, the applicant would not be able to rebuild it. The approval as noted above was amended to include the garage would not be allowed to be rebuilt if found to be structurally unsound after it was moved. Kelley also commented on the hardcover removal on the north side of the residence. He is concerned that it will reappear at some point. Kelley noted that it is human nature to revert back to the norm. It was suggested the applicant work with Staff on a grading is plan to correct any drainage problem along the north side. Callahan questioned whether general terms should be used in the resolution. Mabusth said the resolution will be brought back before the Council in final form for approval and to consider present approval as conceptual. n U Mabusth asked Jabbour if approval was given for either the removal of part of the garage or its entirety. Roelofs asked ii; as part of the construction process, the garage could not be moved after either the footing inspection or the framing process. Kelley questioned if the garage was attached to the other garage, if it would be in excess of the allowable accessory structure square footage. The garage will not be attached to the other but still will not meet the separation requirement and will require a fire wall. Kelley said other variances might be required with this change and felt the application should be tabled to see it in its final form. Callahan said the hardcover calculations at this time are unknown. Ayes 3, Hurr, Goetten, Jabbour; Nays 2, Callahan, Kelley, who said not enough information was known at this time and needed to see the application in final form. Hurr asked that the application be seen at the next meeting later in the agenda so that she would have an opportunity to participate in the consideration of the application. 5