08-28-1995 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 28, 1995 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT • #4 #2033 DONALD & ARLENE KIELLEY, 1670 SHADYWOOD ROAD - t ) VARIANCES - RESOLUTION TABLED Mr. Kielley and contractor, Jerry Roelofs, were present. Mabusth reported that an amended plan presented two options for reduction in structural coverage and hardcover. The original proposal showed an increase of 510 s.f of structural coverage for a 4% variance. Option A would have an increase of 362 s.f for a 3% variance. Option B would increase structural coverage by 361.75 s.f for a 3% variance. Hardcover currently exists at 51.6 %, was originally proposed at 44.8 %, and the amended plan proposed hardcover at 42.6% with the removal of 78 s.f of paving and reduction in structure. Goetten asked what the proposed dimensions were of the deck. The deck would be 34x12' and be in line with the principal structure. It was originally proposed at 10.5x42.5'. Roelofs said he now has a better understanding of structural coverage and hardcover. If the garage were moved out of the County right -of -way, it would result in an increase to the structural coverage. He did not feel it was feasible for the property to have only a • one -car garage. The changes from the original proposal by removing the covered porch extending beyond the house would result in a reduction of 148 s.f. Option B has a stepped area to create a different roof line to the home, which is the preferred option. Concrete driveway area at 78 s.f will also be removed. Hurr asked if the blacktop area by the garage could be reduced in size. Kelley said the original reason stated for the garage space was for storage. In reality, the garage houses a car and not the items normally stored in a basement. Goetten asked Kelley if his main concern was with the garage in the right -of -way. Kelley said the ideal solution would be to take both garages down and rebuild a two -car garage with attic space above it. This would reduce the structural hardcover and coverage and add the needed storage space. Callahan asked if the problem with the size of the home did not occur to the applicant at the time of purchase. Kielley said he was not married at the time. He has lived in the home for three years. Jabbour said he is concerned with the need for bigger houses and potential tear down of residences. Jabbour relayed the pressure to maintain small houses on small lots and allow larger homes on bigger lots. If this property were torn down and found non - conforming, Callahan asked if any variances would be required. Mabusth said area and lot width is variances would be needed. 3