My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
08-28-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:42:49 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 9:42:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 28,1995 <br />• ( 97 - 92046 Lakeview Golf - Continued) <br />Kelley asked, with the escalation of real estate values, should a future extension of <br />development occur that the resolution mandates the structure being removed. Gaffron <br />said the required covenants stipulate that the acreage could be no less than 17 acres or <br />would require the building to come down. <br />Wenkstern said it was possible that the work would not get done this season and asked <br />about a renewal or the best way to go about it. A CUP is good for a year from the date it <br />is approved. A permit could be obtained with a follow -up six months later. Hun said if a <br />grading permit was obtained and the codes met, this would be approved. <br />Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve Application #2046. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />The contractor asked about burning permits on site with diseased elms. Jabbour said the <br />MPCA is the agency that does not allow the burning. Callahan told him to speak with <br />Gerhardson about a permit. Gerhardson noted logs can be burned but not brush. A <br />permit is good for a certain period of time. <br />(#8) #2054 TONY EIDEN COMPANY, 2700 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE WEST - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3593 <br />• Charles Dillerud represented the Eiden Company. <br />Mabusth reported that the application involved the filling of 600 cubic yards for a <br />walkout design residence. The property has positive drainage and no change would <br />occur in the existing drainage patterns. A type 1 wetland to the northwest receives the <br />majority of drainage from the lot. The applicant is asked to create a swale on the south <br />side of the driveway so no drainage flows to the septic areas. An inspection will occur to <br />ensure that erosion control is in place. <br />• <br />Goetten noted that the monument application under consideration at the Planning <br />Commission meeting had no representation. The applicant was informed that 10 people <br />were at the meeting to address the issue and asked for consideration by the applicant to <br />amend original proposal. The applicant was informed to notify Staff if unable to attend <br />so the announcement can be made to inform those in attendance. Dillerud apologized for <br />the misunderstanding. He said he was not informed about the meeting and has taken <br />steps to ensure it would not happen in the future. <br />Hurr moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3593. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.