Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />NIINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 14,1995 <br />(#4 - Donald & Arlene Kielley - Continued) <br />Kelley said it is unknown where the additional hardcover came. The site is limited and • <br />the proposed addition exceeds the ruling made. <br />Hurr asked if the garages both contained furnaces and found that they did. <br />Jabbour said he was concerned with lot density and had a problem with trading <br />something that had been installed without approval. If the applicant wants the new <br />addition, Jabbour said new ideas need to be created. The lot coverage is the key issue <br />according to Jabbour. <br />Mabusth said the contractor was informed that the garage encroaches into the County <br />Road. She also noted that the 1982 resolution noted the conditions in the chain of title. <br />The owner at that time wanted to amend the resolution but didn't proceed with the <br />variance application. <br />Kelley said he would be in favor of the application if the garage that encroaches the <br />roadway be removed. <br />Goetten said there was too much hardcover on the property and should have been <br />removed with the 1982 resolution. <br />The applicant, Kielley responded, that he has taken out the rock beds to turn then back to • <br />a natural area as well as removed timbers. Kielley said he has taken out twice the amount <br />that he is adding. It was noted that the addition only extends 10' out and a vacant lot is <br />next door to the property. Kielley also said that the project would allow better drainage <br />on the property if that was an issue. <br />Goetten said drainage is a concern, but hardcover is the issue. The plastic underlayment <br />removal was cited as being no comparison to gaining new structure. Goetten said the <br />removal must be structural on this small lot. <br />Kielley said he would eliminate the concrete in the walkway and between the garages and <br />confine the turnaround area. He added that the house is small and the storage in the <br />garages is needed. <br />Hurr informed the applicant that the proposal could be tabled allowing the applicant time <br />to review. If Council proceeds and denies the application, the applicant cannot come <br />fo <br />back with the application 64760 days. <br />Callahan moved, Hurr seconded, to continue Application #2033 to the next Council <br />meeting. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />It was suggested to the applicant that he amend the application. • <br />4 <br />