My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-1995 Board of Review Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
04-26-1995 Board of Review Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:25:23 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 9:25:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING <br />• HELD APRIL 26, 1995 <br />Chris and Gail Bollis 220 Stubbs Bgy Road North #32-118-23 42 0003 - 1995 limited market value <br />is at $349,300 with the estimated market value at $350,400 on 20 acres of land. The value has gone <br />up $218,000 in two years. He based his objection on the shadow of the proposed freeway across his <br />land taking approximately 1/3 of it. He compared his property to neighboring land. A 16 -acre parcel <br />with no house was valued at $62,000 in 1994 when his was valued at $274,000 for land only. That <br />calculates out to $13,700 per acre while the neighbor's property would be at $3,931 per acre. A 20- <br />acre parcel across the road with a house on it was valued at $298,000 for the building and $151,500 <br />for the land or $7,500 per acre. A 62 -acre parcel was valued at $361,900 or $5,700 per acre. He felt <br />the land had similar characteristics in all cases and all had the shadow of the freeway on the <br />property. The property across the street was 5 acre zoning while the other properties were 2 acre <br />zoning. The 20 acres was bought in 1989 and he did not know of the southern route that could bisect <br />his property. Erickson thought that the appraiser who did that particular property may have found <br />some other influencing factors. Bollis paid $400,000 for the 20 acres in 1989. He felt the potential <br />freeway lowered the value of his property. Three years ago the property was valued at $130,000 and <br />he should have been in last year to appeal the valuation. He thought the 62 -acre parcel may be in <br />litigation because the seller did not disclose the potential freeway route. He objected to paying more <br />taxes than similar properties and wanted to be treated equally. <br />Dana Halmrast 3287 Casco Circle #20- 117 -23 430044 - 1995 estimated market value was <br />• $107,000 and the limited value was $106,700; 1994 value was at $97,000. An adjustment was given <br />2 years ago and he objects to the inconsistency of appraisals - one year there's a 2% increase and <br />then 18% the next. The property is worth $100,000 by the inflationary level. There is no lakeshore <br />and they are surrounded by homes on the water who only got a 2% increase while they had a 10% <br />increase. <br />Julie Harren 175 Landmark Drive #05- 117 -23 22 0011 - 1995 market value is $319,000 and 1994 <br />value was $305,000. Her neighborhood is a mixed neighborhood. The new house adjacent to their <br />property of about the same is assessed at $300,000 but they have a panoramic view of Stubbs Bay. <br />Their home is 6 years old and she feels their home should be valued less than the neighbors since <br />they have only 2' /z acres and the neighbors have almost 4 acres, they don't have a view of the lake <br />and the houses are about the same size. She feels her property is worth anything less than the <br />neighbors - $299,000 or less. She had pictures to show the Board of her property. She talked with <br />the Assessor who told her it didn't' matter how many acres you had if you only hAd one building site, <br />how old the home was or if there were lake views. This does not seem fair to her. She noted they <br />are not in an executive neighborhood and have a rental property next door. They bought their lot <br />for $120,000 while the neighboring lot sold for $170,000. Erickson clarified that a comparable is <br />a property that has sold recently, not what another property is valued at. Harren asked that the <br />Assessor look at the home on Watertown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road that was listed at <br />$295,000 with 2.8 acres as a comparable assuming that it sold for less than it was listed for. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.