My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
03-27-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 8:55:33 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 8:55:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 27, 1995 <br />• ( 93 - Richard Little - Continued) <br />Goetten asked for clarification that the deck itself is in the 0 -75' setback area. Mabusth <br />confirmed this stating the encroachment will remain as it was originally as defined by <br />hedges already in place defining the original deck area. <br />The applicant commented that the deck was in place prior to the ruling for no hardcover <br />in the 0 -75' zone. <br />Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded, to adopt Resolution #3544 per the Planning <br />Commission recommendation. Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />(#4) #1996 GREGG PERL, 309 WESTLAKE STREET - AFTER THE FACT <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3545 <br />Mr. Perl was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the application is for a side setback variance for work involving an <br />expansion of the roof area required for a bedroom expansion in the upper level. The <br />Planning Commission's minority opined that the applicant should not have installed a <br />patio door without applicant knowing when stairs will be constructed. The majority <br />approved the patio door as is with a proper bar installed over it. <br />is There is an accessory structure which encroaches the neighbor's property as well as <br />exterior storage violations. The applicant responded that the storage violations have <br />been rectified. The 12x12 shed is still in need of removal. The applicant was given the <br />date of April 15, 1995 by which to obtain both permits needed, which are subject to <br />penalties. <br />• <br />Mabusth is concerned with adding a deck off the patio door as it would not meet the 30' <br />side setback. The applicant was informed that the side setback requirement must be met <br />as the deck would be part of the principal structure, and the enclosed approved resolution <br />notifies of a need for a variance would be required if a deck were to be built. Mayor <br />Callahan reminded applicant to make application prior to building the deck. <br />The applicant noted that he has purchased an adjoining property, and the lots have been <br />combined. The applicant originally had .8 acres and now with the acquisition has 1.6 <br />acres. <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, adopt Resolution #3545 with the comment that the <br />applicant check with Staff prior to making any additional structural changes. Ayes 3, <br />Nays 0. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.