My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
03-27-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 8:55:33 AM
Creation date
4/25/2019 8:55:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 27, 1995 <br />( #12 - Highway 12 Safety Improvement and Agreements - Continued) <br />• Callahan asked the cost of the Old Crystal Bay Road bike/hike trail for Orono. Moorse <br />reported a cost of $235,000. Callahan asked what will happen with funding for Ferndale <br />improvements and Co Rd 6. Moorse reported that Cook put figures together on the <br />MSA funds which reflect these expenditures. He noted the inclusion of a $50,000 grant <br />which was applied for to offset the cost of the trail and the possibility of other monies <br />available. Ferndale is being shown as being improved in 1996 but could be put off until <br />at least 1998 if funds were lacking for the CoRd 6 project. <br />• <br />Callahan voiced his amazement at being at the point of signing agreements with Mn/DOT <br />for $300,000 without any priority planning having been done or attention paid to where <br />the money was coming from. Moorse did say that two years ago, there were no plans to <br />improve Ferndale and Co Rd 6, nor was the large cost expected for the signal, which he <br />assumed is a high priority. <br />Jabbour agreed with Moorse's assessment and commented on the need to address <br />priorities on the Council agenda every six months. Jabbour said he has no intention of <br />spending MSA funds on the bike trail at this point. Jabbour says that the Co Rd 6 project <br />and safety improvement issues are important. He said the Council needs to assist Staff in <br />determining the importance of these costs. <br />A member of the public asked what would the state do if notified that there was only <br />$75,000 in the budget and the intersection was not done. The Council reported that the <br />light was being installed at the request of Orono for safety reasons. Council all agreed <br />that the light was necessary, and the City did need to go ahead with the project but to <br />keep costs down. <br />Callahan asked if $199,000 was spent for the signal with $100,000 for Willow Drive <br />safety improvements, if there was any more needed to make this project work. Cook <br />responded that $300,000 is the amount needed for the signal completion. However, the <br />amounts are estimates, and there is a possibility that the actual bids would come in at a <br />higher cost. For example, if the $100,000 signal came in at $110,000, Orono would be <br />responsible for 25% of that additional cost. Callahan voiced the question of whether the <br />City must pay whatever the state says and whether the City has any control whatsoever <br />of these costs. Moorse suggested the agreements not be signed until the final bids are in <br />so the dollar amount is based on the actual bids. <br />The formulas for the state aid were discussed. Moorse said that Staff has not asked the <br />state if the formula can be changed. <br />The various costs for sidewalks, utility improvements, and street lighting to be shared <br />with Long Lake were discussed. Council felt that these improvements could be <br />eliminated to save money. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.