03-13-1995 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13,1995 ( 93 - #1992 - James and Joann Jundt - Continued) Mabusth commented that Mr. Crosby was working with neighbors to petition for municipal sewer, but the area is not one Po°nLSRo list. 15W where an can be picked up is located at Bracke injector station could be installed to discharge into the d uie 995 construction period if Wayzata. The new septic systems must It was noted that a certificate of occupancy will be sewer is not approved for property• granted in the near future. Mr. Benson reported that the applicant was agreeable to removing the paved roadway but asked that the date for the restoration of ground cover be changed to a time of two weeks past the date when load limits are lifted off the roads. The Council agreed that June 1 was acceptable. Kelley felt that the 250' of roadway going up to the tennis court area should be allowed. the location, and Jabbour responded that the applicant was unable ° away from the area and be connected to the applicant could have moved the the roadway y the front driveway. Benson replied to the affirmative of chanuestion The Council also Mrs. Jundt wanted the driveway as proposed reiterated the need for a five -year comprehensive plan to Mr. Benson. • Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3539 with the Planning Commission recommendations and the date r e complete �9Aryes 4, Nays hardcover and • replacement of ground cover changed to (#9) #1996 GREGG PERL, 309 `VESTLAKE STREET - VARIANCE Mr. -Pert was not present. Mayor Callahan tabled Application #1996 to the next meeting of the Council. Staff will advise applicant that action will be taken at that time whether or not applicant is present. ( #10) #1997 SALLY AND JONATHAN LEBEODOFF, 1101 FERNDALE ROAD WEST - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION Mr. Robert Mitchell represented the applicants. Mabusth reported that the application is for removal and replacement of an existing principal structure on a property, which is impacted by both the'lagoon and the main d lake, which both have 75' setback requirements. Area and lot width variances are require the property is in a two -acre zone. The applicants seek a 90% area variance Iodated 17' width variance. The structure is located at a sub- standard lakeshore setback, from the main lake where 75' is required. The structure exists at 0 on the west side lot line where 10' is required. The east side lot line setback is at 11.7' where 10 is required, needing no variance. The property is also encroached by the flood plain at 931.5 elevation is 4